Hi!
On the next schema change (May 15) we will finally separate RG types
in two, to be able to have stuff like "EP + remix" and "Album +
soundtrack". That allows us to do DJ-mix right, so I'm reviving the
old RFC from last September.
I would normally create a wiki page for this, but since we don'
On 04/27/2012 05:28 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> a sequence of several [songs] played one after the other
Maybe "a sequence of several [previously released recordings] played one
after the other"?
Or "already-existing recordings"?
Alex / caller#6
___
On 04/13/2012 04:59 PM, SwissChris wrote:
> Since even native speakers seem unable to tell the actual difference
> between associate and assistant and the distinction is obviously not
> made in any other language I'm familiar with I'd suggest to simply
> drop "associate". It doesn't make sense
Ok... we can always drop associate for now and add it later if it is
requested and accepted with better examples. Is anyone *against* that?
:)
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:04 PM, caller#6
wrote:
>
>
> On 04/13/2012 04:59 PM, SwissChris wrote:
>> Since even native speakers seem unable to tell the act
One possible problem was brought up off-list:
The current guideline says:
“The performance cast, with year, *should* be used…in the release title”
while the proposed guideline says:
“The performance cast, including year, *may* be placed in the
disambiguation comment.”
I made this change due to my
Hello,
On 27/04/12 10:07, caller#6 wrote:
>
>
> On 04/27/2012 05:28 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
>> a sequence of several [songs] played one after the other
>
>
>
> Maybe "a sequence of several [previously released recordings] played one
> after the other"?
In electronic music it is not u
On 04/13/2012 04:00 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-104
>
> Proposal in
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Conductor_Position_Relationship_Type_Proposal_B
> and previous discussion in
> http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/Pre-RFC-Conduc
On 04/27/2012 10:23 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 27/04/12 10:07, caller#6 wrote:
>>
>> On 04/27/2012 05:28 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
>>> a sequence of several [songs] played one after the other
>>
>>
>> Maybe "a sequence of several [previously released recordings] played one
>
