On 21/06/12 15:59, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
So, I think everyone agrees that the current High Quality option sucks
horribly, is only good to annoy editors and should be avoided like the
plague. Our whole quality system needs a re-think, really, but until
that is done, I can see three
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote:
On 21/06/12 15:59, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
So, I think everyone agrees that the current High Quality option sucks
horribly, is only good to annoy editors and should be avoided like the
plague. Our whole quality system
Hello,
On 23/06/12 16:28, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
Would you oppose having HQ do everything as default *except* for
lacking autoedits? (that is, making capitalisation changes and the
like not autoedits)
In general I think having all these conditions be different for
different edit
