2013/1/4 Frederik Freso S. Olesen musicbra...@freso.dk
And maybe change the 2nd note to edited versions of the same mix
(currently recording)
I think this depends on whether it is a someone recorded this
recording, or a MusicBrainz entity Recording. If it's the latter,
which I'm guessing it
Time is over, J-Lyric.net is allowable for lyrics sites white list.
Reopening the ticket http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-156 … :)
-
THIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS FAKE/VOID,
I WILL NOT RECEIVE YOUR EMAILS.
If you want to reply, use the following good stuff instead :
Den 07-01-2013 11:32, jesus2099 skrev:
Time is over, J-Lyric.net is allowable for lyrics sites white list.
Reopening the ticket http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-156 … :)
Did we get a go from Rob yet?
--
Namasté,
Frederik Freso S. Olesen http://freso.dk/
MB:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Frederik Freso S. Olesen
musicbra...@freso.dk wrote:
Den 07-01-2013 11:32, jesus2099 skrev:
Time is over, J-Lyric.net is allowable for lyrics sites white list.
Reopening the ticket http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-156 … :)
Did we get a go from Rob
Hello,
This proposal is for adding a Digital Download option in the medium
format list, under the Digital Media entry. (so at the same level as
USB Flash Drive).
I will quote what Alastair said on the ticket:
There is no explicit medium format for digital downloads. They seem to
have to be
On Jan 7, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote:
Hello,
This proposal is for adding a Digital Download option in the medium
format list, under the Digital Media entry. (so at the same level as
USB Flash Drive).
I will quote what Alastair said on the ticket:
There is no
-1 from me.
Digital media was originally added for downloads and is almost
exclusively used for downloads. It's our second most common format, so
adding a new format will mean we end up needing to migrate tens of
thousands of releases for very questionable benefits.
Using it for non-downloads
2013/1/4 Frederik Freso S. Olesen musicbra...@freso.dk
Den 04-01-2013 08:04, Kuno Woudt skrev:
On 01/03/2013 11:52 PM, Ben Ockmore wrote:
I would say so - I don't see any reason why not, they can be copyrighted
just as much as recordings...
I'm not sure a work as we use it in musicbrainz
I agree we should flatten the hierarchy there rather than introduce a new
sub-type. Perhaps we could rename digital media to digital download instead?
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Den 08-01-2013 00:48, Ben Ockmore skrev:
I agree we should flatten the hierarchy there rather than introduce a
new sub-type. Perhaps we could rename digital media to digital download
instead?
What is a non-digital download?
Wouldn't it make more sense to rename it Downloaded media instead?
On 2013 Jan 8, at 0:48, Ben Ockmore wrote:
I agree we should flatten the hierarchy there rather than introduce a new
sub-type. Perhaps we could rename digital media to digital download instead?
I'd be happy with that.
-- kuno / warp.
___
On 2013 Jan 8, at 1:00, Frederik Freso S. Olesen wrote:
Den 08-01-2013 00:48, Ben Ockmore skrev:
I agree we should flatten the hierarchy there rather than introduce a
new sub-type. Perhaps we could rename digital media to digital download
instead?
What is a non-digital download?
Digital
12 matches
Mail list logo
