2013/4/9 pabouk
> LordSputnik wrote
> >
> > lixobix wrote
> >> Also, are we keeping partial recordings, i.e. extracts from recordings,
> >> as separate recordings?
> > I expect so, it's not part of this guideline (I'm not entirely sure where
> > that's spoken about in the docs).
>
> I think that
On 9 April 2013 00:53, pabouk wrote:
> LordSputnik wrote
> >
> > lixobix wrote
> >> Also, are we keeping partial recordings, i.e. extracts from recordings,
> >> as separate recordings?
> > I expect so, it's not part of this guideline (I'm not entirely sure where
> > that's spoken about in the doc
Is the plan to deprecate or rename the remaster relationship? It might help
if we knew what to call e.g. the Beatles 'remasters' since remix is already
taken. But obviously they should be linked with the original recordings
On 9 April 2013 09:01, Tom Crocker wrote:
> On 9 April 2013 00:53, pabo
On 04/04/2013 02:06, Sheamus Patt wrote:
> Seems I was wrong though - "Diana - Princess of Wales" is already an MB
> "artist"
> http://musicbrainz.org/artist/5c216e1a-cfda-445a-b6cd-c30b90b12bb8 .
Yes, but those credits are just wrong:
http://musicbrainz.org/release/97a5f481-be87-44be-bff1-786c
On 01/04/2013 19:48, Deanna Earley wrote:
> Songs are sometimes written with a dedication to another artist, but MB
> doesn't seem to have any way to mark this yet.
> Can a "in homage to" relationship be added to works?
We do already have the "tribute to" relationship for release groups. So
I thi
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, monxton wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 19:48, Deanna Earley wrote:
> > Songs are sometimes written with a dedication to another artist, but MB
> > doesn't seem to have any way to mark this yet.
> > Can a "in homage to" relationship be added to works?
>
> We do already have
Tom Crocker wrote
> here:
> http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Edit_Relationship_Type
But isn't the relationship type deprecated?
http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Category:Alternative_Version_Relationship_Class
If not, then the recording guidelines should state that partial recordings
are new recordings.
-
On 9 April 2013 14:41, lixobix wrote:
> Tom Crocker wrote
> > here:
> > http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Edit_Relationship_Type
>
> But isn't the relationship type deprecated?
>
> http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Category:Alternative_Version_Relationship_Class
>
I thought it was "Earliest release" that was
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 9, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, monxton
> wrote:
>> On 01/04/2013 19:48, Deanna Earley wrote:
>> > Songs are sometimes written with a dedication to another artist, but MB
>> > doesn't seem to have an
homage, dedication, tribute, celebration, recognition, praise. They are all
forms of honour and it would be nice if we could group them together. Maybe
you could have an honour relationship and choose the type of honour. But I
presume we want to steer clear of 'thanks' lists.
On 9 April 2013 13:3
On 04/03/2013 05:16 PM, LordSputnik wrote:
> Well, an artist that's already in MB for some other reason, or if not, one
> that could conceivably be included in MB for some other reason.
>
> What I'm saying is, I don't think dedicatees should be added as artists just
> because they're written down a
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Tom Crocker wrote:
> homage, dedication, tribute, celebration, recognition, praise. They are all
> forms of honour and it would be nice if we could group them together. Maybe
> you could have an honour relationship and choose the type of honou
On 09/04/2013 13:37, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, monxton wrote:
>
> We do already have the "tribute to" relationship for release groups. So
> I think this should use the same form of words.
>
> That'd restrict it quite a lot, though. Britten's Cello
On Apr 9, 2013 9:18 PM, "monxton" wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2013 13:37, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, monxton wrote:
> >
> > We do already have the "tribute to" relationship for release
groups. So
> > I think this should use the same form of words.
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo
