We're getting there
On 17 April 2013 01:10, LordSputnik ben.s...@gmail.com wrote:
I've slightly altered the definition of recording to what I see as a
simple,
straightforward sentence reflecting the comments from the past few days.
MusicBrainz Recordings do not indicate any particular mastering. isn't
quite clear to my French ears. I feel I understand what you mean because I
knew it before. Maybe adding a link to the specific Recording Style Guide
section would help. Or Different remasters should not appear as different
Also, shouldn't the definition page say how the duration is calculated. If
it isn't stated here, I don't know where users would find it.
2013/4/17 Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com
MusicBrainz Recordings do not indicate any particular mastering. isn't
quite clear to my French ears. I
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.comwrote:
Also, shouldn't the definition page say how the duration is calculated. If
it isn't stated here, I don't know where users would find it.
It probably should... once we know. At some point they'll start being
2013/4/17 Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com
MusicBrainz Recordings do not indicate any particular mastering. isn't
quite clear to my French ears. I feel I understand what you mean because I
knew it before. Maybe adding a link to the specific Recording Style Guide
section would help. Or
2013/4/17 Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.com
2013/4/17 Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com
MusicBrainz Recordings do not indicate any particular mastering. isn't
quite clear to my French ears. I feel I understand what you mean because I
knew it before. Maybe adding a link to the
Is there something you don't like about my version, perhaps the potential
ambiguity of original? It tries to define when mixed / edited is necessary
(when its a derivative recording).
A MusicBrainz Recording is an original audio track or the product of
mixing and/or editing one or more audio
Tom Crocker wrote
Actually, if you deconstruct this, since audio track is defined as
recorded
sound (RS), you have:
mixed RS, edited RS, mixed and edited RS, unmixed and unedited RS. Which
equals RS in all forms...
No, that's not correct.
It would be correct, if not for the words the result
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote
I feel a little strange that there is no direct link from this definition
page to the definition pages of other core entities. I believe this
definition page could give an indication of how Recordings are connected
to
other core entities. Something like A Recording
Tom Crocker wrote
A MusicBrainz Recording is an original audio track or the product of
mixing and/or editing one or more audio tracks.
My issue is that i think 'audio track' is synonymous with 'recording', e.g.:
A MusicBrainz Recording is an original recording or the product of
mixing and/or
LordSputnik wrote
In MusicBrainz, a Recording is either the result of mixing and/or editing
one or more audio tracks, or unmixed and unedited recorded sound.
An audio track is recorded sound, captured from a studio or live
performance or from other audio sources, including existing
lixobix wrote
My issue is that i think 'audio track' is synonymous with 'recording',
e.g.:
A MusicBrainz Recording is an original recording or the product of
mixing and/or editing one or more recordings.
No, audio track is much more specific than a recording.
lixobix wrote
Anyway, I
Tom Crocker wrote
I see what you're saying, but I think it's fair to say the product of
mixing recorded sound is mixed recorded sound. Anyway, I'm happy to leave
it.
Yes, the product of mixing is mixed recorded sound, but not all mixed
recorded sound is the direct produce of mixing.
Tom
Tom Crocker wrote
Currently, audio-track includes existing recordings(which is necessary
for
the mixing and editing definitions), and recorded sound, so I'm not sure
in
which way it's more specific than a recording? I was using it as a
convenient way of talking about *any* recording,
Salutaurs in http://forums.musicbrainz.org/viewtopic.php?pid=21512 pointed
out that the current conductor page says chorus master should be used for
choral conductors: http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Conductor_Relationship_Type
That's just wrong I'd say - many choirs have both positions, and many
15 matches
Mail list logo
