My only question is whether this recording in this format counts as a
release. I could be wrong but it sounds like only one copy ever existed?
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
I've updated the PiratePad with my latest proposal, which incorporates bits
of the other proposals. I think I've solved the release track - recording
problem, and I'm fairly happy with audio tracks now.
Where you describe release tracks, you might want to use the nice phrasing
you came up
I've added a version too, so far it's a copy of LordSputnik's latest except
for the release track part.
2013/4/29 Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.com
I've updated the PiratePad with my latest proposal, which incorporates bits
of the other proposals. I think I've solved the release track -
I've added a version too, so far it's a copy of LordSputnik's latest except
for the release track part.
/symphonick
Yep, I prefer that.
Personally, I'd put the bit about mastering back into the main definition.
In MusicBrainz, a *recording* is a set of one or more *audio tracks*, which
may
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.comwrote:
My only question is whether this recording in this format counts as a
release. I could be wrong but it sounds like only one copy ever existed?
Well, we add stuff with limited editions of 25 or so, a limited edition of
Yes, it sounds like it was gifted to the Smithsonian. I don't know how we
apply the rules to cases like this (or how we should) but it seems to me
like the release is the file the Smithsonian have put on their website, but
the recording is this wax and cardboard disc?
On 29 April 2013 10:15,
2013/4/29 Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.com
I've added a version too, so far it's a copy of LordSputnik's latest
except for the release track part.
Yep, I prefer that.
Personally, I'd put the bit about mastering back into the main definition.
In MusicBrainz, a *recording* is a set of
No, the set *has* not been mastered, rather than the elements *have* not
been mastered.
But I can see that it could be interpreted that way -- so if it would be
confusing we probably shouldn't do it.
On 29 April 2013 10:46, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/4/29 Tom Crocker
Not necessarily that we shouldn't do it at all, but certainly not in such a
way that it could be misinterpreted. Maybe something like:
In MusicBrainz, a *recording* is a set of one or more *audio tracks*, which
may have been *mixed* or *edited*. Please note that mastering alone does
not define
On 29 April 2013 11:13, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
Not necessarily that we shouldn't do it at all, but certainly not in such
a way that it could be misinterpreted. Maybe something like:
In MusicBrainz, a *recording* is a set of one or more *audio tracks*,
which may have
IMO in non-classical context at least, arrange should be a recording level
relationship to artist.
This is bnot a veto as I have not read the RFC.
-
jesus2099, Tristan, patate12, GOLD MASTER KING
using a FAKE EMAIL ADDRESS
--
View this message in context:
http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-215-td4652281.html
I love your FF6 avatar ! Please next time put the summary of the change in
the title, not just RFC-XXX. :)
-
jesus2099, Tristan, patate12, GOLD MASTER KING
using a FAKE EMAIL ADDRESS
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:23 PM, jesus2099 hta3s836gzac...@jetable.orgwrote:
IMO in non-classical context at least, arrange should be a recording level
relationship to artist.
This is bnot a veto as I have not read the RFC.
jesus:
+1 for separate or distinct
I've been trying to edit the edit section, but I'm not 100% happy with
the results so far. Ideas?
2013/4/29 Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.com
On 29 April 2013 11:13, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
Not necessarily that we shouldn't do it at
Can you tell us what you don't like about the current versions of edit?
On Apr 29, 2013 6:02 PM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for separate or distinct
I've been trying to edit the edit section, but I'm not 100% happy with
the results so far. Ideas?
2013/4/29 Tom Crocker
2013/4/29 Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.com
Can you tell us what you don't like about the current versions of edit?
Firstly, I'd like it to mention that an edit can mean something else
outside of MB. I believe the other definitions are reasonably close to
their real-world counterparts, but
16 matches
Mail list logo
