Just that - telling people to add legal names to the annotation doesn't
really make a lot of sense anymore.
Only changed sentence is:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Artist/With_multiple_names#I_just_added_a_new_.28performance_name.29_artist_to_the_database._Should_I_go_ahead_and_create
+1
Can't artist credits and aliases be used for most of this stuff?
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
I'd probably change the title of that section slightly.
I just added a new artist to the database using their performance name.
Should I go ahead and create another entry for the legal name as well?
reads more clearly to me. It also makes it sound less like the multiple
performance names that are
On 13-05-31 06:09 AM, Ben Ockmore wrote:
> Can't artist credits and aliases be used for most of this stuff?
>
Artist Credits are only permitted in specific places, and in particular
are not supported for performance relationships and such. Aliases help
in a search, but aren't what you see when vi
+1
I do have to stipulate though that a lot of performance names are only used
during set periods of time (e.g. 氷室京介 performed as 氷室狂介 from 1981 to 1988 while
he was active with BOØWY). You might want to include a guideline as such since
only the last section deals with this.
> ___
Shouldn’t we say that legal name artist is useful only when :
1. we have several different pen-names to link to it or
2. we have to credit songs with it or
3. we have any kind of AR to do with it
?
Tristan la patate12 de jesus2099
-
jesus2099, Tristan, patate12, GOLD MASTER KING
using a FAKE
On May 31, 2013, at 1:19 PM, jesus2099 wrote:
> Shouldn’t we say that legal name artist is useful only when :
> 1. we have several different pen-names to link to it or
> 2. we have to credit songs with it or
> 3. we have any kind of AR to do with it
> ?
> Tristan la patate12 de jesus2099
>
Thi
We're already a bit off-topic from the issue of legal name aliases by
talking about artist merges, but what if the performance name is just the
first name? I've been of the opinion it's beneficial to merge, say, a
"Lisa" into a "Lisa Smith", because it *is* clutter to have editors enter
"Lisa" int
On May 31, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Duke Yin wrote:
> We're already a bit off-topic from the issue of legal name aliases by talking
> about artist merges, but what if the performance name is just the first name?
> I've been of the opinion it's beneficial to merge, say, a "Lisa" into a
> "Lisa Smith
On 05/31/2013 01:19 PM, jesus2099 wrote:
> Shouldn’t we say that legal name artist is useful only when :
> 1. we have several different pen-names to link to it or
This is IMO the only place it’s useful. As for the others…
> 2. we have to credit songs with it or
That’s why we have Artist Credits
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 05/31/2013 01:19 PM, jesus2099 wrote:
> > Shouldn’t we say that legal name artist is useful only when :
> > 1. we have several different pen-names to link to it or
>
> This is IMO the only place it’s useful. As for the others…
>
> > 2. we ha
11 matches
Mail list logo
