RFC http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-234
*1.* Direct translation is very rare with songs.
*2.* Most seen credits are either /language-name-here *adaptations*/ or
/language-name-here *lyrics*/ (new lyrics) : we have to analyse whether it
is direct translation or not, which goes against
is it the word that is mostly printed rather than adapt ?
In french, *adaptation* (adapt) is better suited and most used than
*traduction* (tranlsate).
-
jesus2099, Tristan, patate12, GOLD MASTER KING
using a FAKE EMAIL ADDRESS
--
View this message in context:
updated
2013/8/9 Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.com
As someone who knows pretty much nothing about classical, a link to
Wikipedia for urtext would be handy. Or a brief definition in brackets. The
same probably goes for quite a few of these terms. Obviously I'm unlikely
to be doing heavy
I’ve been using translated optuion as just a keyword saying this work is in
other language but have been criticised it was not real translations.
Ultiumately, we don’t even need such an option if it doesn’t just mean other
language as we already have the work lanuages that are different.
I’m
On 08/09/2013 10:46 AM, symphonick wrote:
updated
Much better!
General comments:
I think “secondary alias” is confusing (there is no mention of
“secondary” in the interface. I would use “non-primary alias” instead,
or “search hint alias” if applicable.)
There are a few places where you say
On 08/09/2013 11:14 AM, jesus2099 wrote:
I’ve been using translated optuion as just a keyword saying this work is in
other language but have been criticised it was not real translations.
Ultiumately, we don’t even need such an option if it doesn’t just mean other
language as we already have
2013/8/9 jesus2099 hta3s836gzac...@jetable.org
I’ve been using translated optuion as just a keyword saying this work is in
other language but have been criticised it was not real translations.
Ultiumately, we don’t even need such an option if it doesn’t just mean
other
language as we already
RFC http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-236
Add *maxi* secondary RG type on *single* primary type.
When those so called *maxi singles* are not called EP nor just singles by
the issuers.
RFC end date : *16 august 2013*
-
jesus2099, Tristan, patate12, GOLD MASTER KING
using a FAKE
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 09:39 -0700, jesus2099 wrote:
Add *mini* secondary RG type on *album* primary type.
When those so called *mini albums* are not called EP by the issuers.
RFC end date : *16 august 2013*
This is actually an issue with both your mini and maxi proposals:
At present,
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 09:41 -0700, jesus2099 wrote:
RFC http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-236
Add *maxi* secondary RG type on *single* primary type.
When those so called *maxi singles* are not called EP nor just singles by
the issuers.
RFC end date : *16 august 2013*
My
According to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxi_single
It doesn't seem to be that simple... especially today where 8cm cds are
practically non-existent.
I wouldn't mind have Maxi being a sub-type of Single. What would be the
advantage of an Attribute vs a secondrary type?
On Fri, Aug 9,
2013/8/9 Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net
On 08/09/2013 10:46 AM, symphonick wrote:
updated
Much better!
General comments:
I think “secondary alias” is confusing (there is no mention of
“secondary” in the interface. I would use “non-primary alias” instead,
or “search hint alias” if
Calvin Walton-2 wrote
My opinion is that Mini-Album is sufficiently distinct from Album
such that it probably does deserve to be its own primary type; although
it might make sense to merge it with EP instead (discuss!)
--
Calvin Walton lt;
calvin.walton@
gt;
Personally, because I
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 13:18 -0400, Lemire, Sebastien wrote:
According to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxi_single
It doesn't seem to be that simple... especially today where 8cm cds are
practically non-existent.
I wouldn't mind have Maxi being a sub-type of Single. What would be the
refresh_daemon wrote
Calvin Walton-2 wrote
My opinion is that Mini-Album is sufficiently distinct from Album
such that it probably does deserve to be its own primary type; although
it might make sense to merge it with EP instead (discuss!)
--
Calvin Walton lt;
calvin.walton@
gt;
On 08/09/2013 02:12 PM, symphonick wrote:
Now that you mention artist intent, my advice about original titles
looks problematic too. If artist intent overrides, we can't change the
title given by the composer?
Good question. We do need the title to be recognizable in the search
results.
This
2013/8/9 Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net
On 08/09/2013 02:12 PM, symphonick wrote:
Now that you mention artist intent, my advice about original titles
looks problematic too. If artist intent overrides, we can't change the
title given by the composer?
Good question. We do need the title
lixobix wrote
refresh_daemon wrote
Calvin Walton-2 wrote
My opinion is that Mini-Album is sufficiently distinct from Album
such that it probably does deserve to be its own primary type; although
it might make sense to merge it with EP instead (discuss!)
--
Calvin Walton lt;
18 matches
Mail list logo
