Re: [mb-style] RFC. revert “several labels on release” NGS feature

2013-12-13 Thread Rachel Dwight
On Dec 12, 2013, at 11:27 PM, Jazzy Jarilith jazzyjaril...@gmail.com wrote: I agree there is no need to have both a parent label and a sublabel on a given release but what about joint releases? - 1 Exactly. I’ve seen this on a lot of Toshiba EMI/EMI Music Japan releases (not just by THE

[mb-style] RFV: Featured artists clarification

2013-12-13 Thread August Janse
Expected expiration date: December 15 Bug tracker: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-270 Wiki proposal: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Tularion/Featured_artists_clarification Forum discussion: forums.musicbrainz.org/viewtopic.php?pid=23765 Clarifies which creditings should be

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Featured artists clarification

2013-12-13 Thread Ross Tyler
Thanks for championing this cause. Improvement here is long overdue. As I mentioned in RFC, I believe the best improvement would be to scrap this guidance altogether. I understand, however, that that is beyond what you are trying to do - which is to keep the accepted guidance but make it

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Featured artists clarification

2013-12-13 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Ross Tyler rossety...@gmail.com wrote: However, if our rationale for this normalization is to make such MB taggers happy, why is it being limited to just English? It seems to me the same rationale should apply equally to all languages. Shouldn't we want to

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Featured artists clarification

2013-12-13 Thread Ross Tyler
On 12/13/2013 08:38 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Ross Tyler rossety...@gmail.com mailto:rossety...@gmail.com wrote: However, if our rationale for this normalization is to make such MB taggers happy, why is it being limited to just English?