Sorry for coming in so late, but maybe we should go back to RFC and rethink
the whole thing: I understand and share Ross Tyler's concerns about making
a guideline singloing out just one word. Right now what seems to be the
consensus about the *general* guideline use whatever link-term is written
Den 14-12-2013 13:24, SwissChris skrev:
Sorry for coming in so late, but maybe we should go back to RFC and
rethink the whole thing: I understand and share Ross Tyler's concerns
about making a guideline [...]
This RFC is not making (or even changing!) a guideline, it's rewording
an already
Pretty much exactly what Freso said, with my style leader hat on. For
further improvements please send a second RFC in a couple days :)
On 14 Dec 2013 15:05, Frederik Freso S. Olesen freso...@gmail.com
wrote:
Den 14-12-2013 13:24, SwissChris skrev:
Sorry for coming in so late, but maybe we
Also, I would think that our guidance would include the reason(s) why
featuring is so special that it needs to be normalized while all other
words are not.
Without this rationale, I am afraid, this guidance is just dogma.
The problem here is that we are dealing with a genre specific
