Hi! I'm out for the weekend and I'm not too sure what to do with this, so I
created a poll to find out what people actually think I should do. Could
everyone (who has an opinion at all) vote on
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Place_types ? Thanks! :)
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
Den 23-01-2014 23:47, Ulrich Klauer skrev:
I am somewhat inclined to agree that a separate subtype of group is
justified that comprises the notion of a larger instrumental/vocal
body where the identity of the individual members is considered less
important. (Still subject to objection 1,
2014/1/25 Frederik Freso S. Olesen freso...@gmail.com
Den 23-01-2014 23:47, Ulrich Klauer skrev:
I am somewhat inclined to agree that a separate subtype of group is
justified that comprises the notion of a larger instrumental/vocal
body where the identity of the individual members is
Den 25-01-2014 14:52, symphonick skrev:
If I understand you correctly; instead of selecting string quartet
from a list, the user should select type=group, instrument = violin,
violin, viola, cello, number of members on stage = 4 (essentially a new
attribute that means quartet, or some other
I like idea of arena/stadium.
-Original Message-
From: Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
Sent: 25.01.2014. 12:29
To: MusicBrainz Style Discussion musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Subject: [mb-style] Post-RFV poll: Stadium/Arena (please answer! :) )
Hi! I'm out for
Membership of quartets changes over time. For example the Tokyo String Quartet
has a listing of six members. In this case there are some dates of membership
available, but they are clearly not complete as five of those six are shown as
potentially current members. And in a great many cases the
As Brant said, over time any group can have many different members.
I believe these categories must be manually assigned. (Think about larger
ensembles/orchestras.)
2014/1/25 Frederik Freso S. Olesen freso...@gmail.com
Den 25-01-2014 14:52, symphonick skrev:
If I understand you correctly;
