Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add "mini-album" primary type

2014-02-19 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
"Not sure what the state of affairs is here. Should this be going back to RFC? There was a lot of support in the RFV, but some objections too." That doesn't seem like it would be reasonable - it's going to be vetoed with the exact same reasoning. The proposal process says "if the changes would en

Re: [mb-style] Pre-RFC (no ticket yet): Plagiarism relationship type

2014-02-19 Thread Staffan
19 februari 2014, Rachel Dwight skrev:I added the stipulation for there to have been a lawsuit to prevent people from using the relationship for conclusions they drew themselves or from reviewers or critics like in http://www.nyrock.com/reviews/alfee.htmNo objections then.  ___

Re: [mb-style] Pre-RFC (no ticket yet): Plagiarism relationship type

2014-02-19 Thread Rachel Dwight
On Feb 19, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Staffan Vilcans wrote: > > Rachel Dwight wrote: >> I just thought this up: >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:HibiscusKazeneko/Plagiarism_Relationship_Type >> I know of dozens of works where one party has claimed another artist's >> work ripped off his or her own.

Re: [mb-style] RFV-293: 'has show notes at' relationship

2014-02-19 Thread Rachel Dwight
Show notes are different from reviews, primarily (in my experience) because they're written by the artists themselves or someone close to the artist. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 19, 2014, at 7:40 AM, jesus2099 wrote: > > I have looked at the examples, why not using the current *review* AR ? >

Re: [mb-style] RFV-293: 'has show notes at' relationship

2014-02-19 Thread jesus2099
I have looked at the examples, why not using the current *review* AR ? Which also works for live reports of recorded concerts. -  PATATE12   jesus2099   GOLD MASTER KING   FAKE E-MAIL ADDRESS  -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-293-has-show-notes

Re: [mb-style] Pre-RFC (no ticket yet): Plagiarism relationship type

2014-02-19 Thread jesus2099
btw it seems that your ripoff tag is applied on both ripoff and riped off works. :) https://musicbrainz.org/work/65f16e2e-f20d-3acc-b5b8-f75c724d6b04 -  PATATE12   jesus2099   GOLD MASTER KING   FAKE E-MAIL ADDRESS  -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com

Re: [mb-style] Pre-RFC (no ticket yet): Plagiarism relationship type

2014-02-19 Thread jesus2099
I prefer keeping the objective *is an earlier version of* current AR. I don’t understand its problem clearly. -  PATATE12   jesus2099   GOLD MASTER KING   FAKE E-MAIL ADDRESS  -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/Pre-RFC-no-ticket-yet-Plagiarism-relati

Re: [mb-style] Pre-RFC (no ticket yet): Plagiarism relationship type

2014-02-19 Thread Staffan Vilcans
Rachel Dwight wrote: > I just thought this up: > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:HibiscusKazeneko/Plagiarism_Relationship_Type > I know of dozens of works where one party has claimed another artist's > work ripped off his or her own. I even made a folksonomy tag in an effort > to track them all:

[mb-style] Pre-RFC (no ticket yet): Plagiarism relationship type

2014-02-19 Thread Rachel Dwight
I just thought this up: http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:HibiscusKazeneko/Plagiarism_Relationship_Type I know of dozens of works where one party has claimed another artist's work ripped off his or her own. I even made a folksonomy tag in an effort to track them all: https://musicbrainz.org/tag/r