On 3/1/2014 4:10 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
I think part of the problem here is that translation is currently used
pretty much as some lyrics in a different language whether it's a
translation or not (which IMO is a mistake) rendering it meaningless. If
we did indicate actual
So if that means an additional line in the guidelines, saying Do only use
if it really is a pretty close translation, otherwise use simply ''version
of'' I could probably +1 this, too - even if I don't believe it will
change much.
What would the term be to use in relationships for the person that
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
So if that means an additional line in the guidelines, saying Do only use
if it really is a pretty close translation, otherwise use simply ''version
of'' I could probably +1 this, too - even if I don't believe it will
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
reosare...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
So if that means an additional line in the guidelines, saying Do only
use if it really is a pretty close translation, otherwise use
On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
So if that means an additional line in the guidelines, saying Do only use if
it really is a pretty close translation, otherwise use simply
It sounds like the old mb-classic releases vs. facts.
We can't (IMO) put incorrect information @ mb-work level.
Right now I don't have any ideas except use the release annotation? or add
extra release credits AND use the release annotation?
2014-03-03 21:44 GMT+01:00 Rachel Dwight
2014-03-03 21:44 GMT+01:00 Rachel Dwight hibiscuskazen...@gmail.com:
On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
reosare...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
So if that means an additional line in the guidelines, saying Do
2014-03-03 22:23 GMT+01:00 symphonick symphon...@gmail.com:
It sounds like the old mb-classic releases vs. facts.
Right :-)
We can't (IMO) put incorrect information @ mb-work level.
Right now I don't have any ideas except use the release annotation? or add
extra release credits AND use
RFC expected expiration date: 2014-03-11.
I would love to see Brilliant Box as a new packaging type. It’s like a
Jewel Case from the outside, but inside it fits 2 discs, as it has extra
plastic piece inside, that can hold 1 disc on each side.
It can be seen here:
+1
On Mar 3, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Marko markosults...@gmail.com wrote:
RFC expected expiration date: 2014-03-11.
I would love to see Brilliant Box as a new packaging type. It’s like a Jewel
Case from the outside, but inside it fits 2 discs, as it has extra plastic
piece inside, that can
10 matches
Mail list logo
