Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-298: New packaging type: Brilliant Box

2014-03-12 Thread Marko
No, mainly because of 2 things: 1) fatboxes are also jewel cases that fit 2 CD’s, yet they look quite different 2) they don’t have to be CD’s, I have at least one with CD+DVD combination. “Double Disc” could be replaced with “2 Disc”, however. Marko Sultsing markosults...@gmail.com 2014-03-12

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-298: New packaging type: Brilliant Box

2014-03-12 Thread Ross Tyler
In MB, how can a jewel case be confused with a fatbox when we already have separate types for it. It seems that everything else you are describing with Standard Width Double Disc Jewel Case is already described in MB as 2xsome media in a jewel case. On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Marko

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-298: New packaging type: Brilliant Box

2014-03-12 Thread Staffan Vilcans
Marko skrev: No, mainly because of 2 things: 1) fatboxes are also jewel cases that fit 2 CD’s, yet they look quite different 2) they don’t have to be CD’s, I have at least one with CD+DVD combination. “Double Disc” could be replaced with “2 Disc”, however. The number of discs (there are

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-298: New packaging type: Brilliant Box

2014-03-12 Thread Marko
Sure (if people have entered them) but what does that has to do with this proposal? Number of discs does not say what kind of packaging is used. 2 CD’s could be in separate single disc jewel cases just as well. Also saying how many discs a case can fit does not mean there can’t be multiple cases,

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-298: New packaging type: Brilliant Box

2014-03-12 Thread Staffan Vilcans
Marko skrev: The disc count is just for quickly finding the correct packaging type from the list. Unless we use “Brilliant Box”, I’m not sure how we can clearly differentiate it from single disc jewel case. I'm questioning the need to differentiate it. It's jewel case. Such cases may contain

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-298: New packaging type: Brilliant Box

2014-03-12 Thread Kuno Woudt
Hello! On 03/12/2014 03:23 PM, Marko wrote: Sure (if people have entered them) but what does that has to do with this proposal? Number of discs does not say what kind of packaging is used. 2 CD’s could be in separate single disc jewel cases just as well. But then there will usually be

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-298: New packaging type: Brilliant Box

2014-03-12 Thread Marko
I’m just saying medium count is not always an accurate indicator of what kind of packaging is used, and should be irrelevant to this proposal. Currently I have gotten a +1, no objections/suggestions regarding the new name/type, and the minimum date has passed. So unless I get additional relevant

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-298: New packaging type: Brilliant Box

2014-03-12 Thread Tom Crocker
On 12 Mar 2014 19:34, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote: Hello! On 03/12/2014 03:23 PM, Marko wrote: Sure (if people have entered them) but what does that has to do with this proposal? Number of discs does not say what kind of packaging is used. 2 CD's could be in separate single disc

Re: [mb-style] RFC-2: Add Resident Advisor to Other Databases whitelist

2014-03-12 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
+1 ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style