Re: [mb-style] RFC Previously known as artist relationship

2014-04-19 Thread Mihai Spinei
+1 On Sunday, April 20, 2014 at 11:23, Rachel Dwight wrote: +1 In a lot of cases it’s not practical to merge the artists together, especially if they have composition or performance ARs under the previous name. On Apr 19, 2014, at 9:17 PM, Daniel Sobey d...@dns.id.au

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-311: Add 'Demo' as secondary release group type

2014-03-23 Thread Mihai Spinei
+1 took a long time to get this one. hopefully it will pass On Monday, March 24, 2014 at 6:32, Tom Crocker wrote: +1 You're dead right. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org

Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type

2014-01-26 Thread Mihai Spinei
I guess since the vote tally is two positive and two negative, this is in limbo/not passed? Sorry, I’m new at making feature requests to MB... On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 7:49, Mihai Spinei wrote: Hi, Thanks for that description lixobix, I edited it in into my wiki page ^^ http

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-288: allow tribute artist-artist AR

2014-01-24 Thread Mihai Spinei
isn’t this what the start/end dates in Advanced Relationships are for? On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 17:15, Staffan Vilcans wrote: th1rtyf0ur skrev: A number of artists/bands on MB are tributes (aka cover bands) to other artists- this will allow these to be related via AR. This is

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-288: allow tribute artist-artist AR

2014-01-24 Thread Mihai Spinei
Staffan Vilcans wrote: Yes, but how can you possibly able to tell that on this specific date the band was no longer a tribute band? The first time they played an own song? Taking a band I’m familiar with. BUCK-TICK ceased to be a cover band in 1984: The band played as Buck-Tick for the first

Re: [mb-style] RFV STYLE-282: add mini-album primary type

2014-01-23 Thread Mihai Spinei
Hi, Thanks for that description lixobix, I edited it in into my wiki page ^^ http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:D4rkie/Release_Group/Type#Mini-Album On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 4:39, Kuno Woudt wrote: Hi, On 01/23/2014 07:07 PM, lixobix wrote: I'd put something like this in the

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Missing primary types for Asian releases

2014-01-21 Thread Mihai Spinei
. On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 19:14, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:23 AM, drsaunde drsau...@hotmail.com (mailto:drsau...@hotmail.com) wrote: Mihai Spinei wrote Hi, In Asia, particularly Japan and South Korea, CD albums which have up to 6 songs are called

[mb-style] RFC: Missing primary types for Asian releases

2014-01-15 Thread Mihai Spinei
Hi, I made this ticket http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-282 in hopes to get 2 types I often find myself mis-categorising as EPs and Singles In Asia, particularly Japan and South Korea, CD albums which have up to 6 songs are called Mini-Albums, and 8+ songs - Full Albums. In

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Missing primary types for Asian releases

2014-01-15 Thread Mihai Spinei
on maxi-singles: I’d use the original naming present in the press release and/or written on the booklet as the source release group. digital releases often are called EPs when they were not such originally, so I’d just ignore that unless the digital release came first (like some bandcamp