Proposal: Artist Type {person, group, project}
Why needed?: There are many projects entering the database that don't fit in
Person or Group. This makes the database less accurate.(more on this later)
Coding needed?: Unsure
Effect on the current system?: Unsure
I brought this up in Users
net release == wordwide
this is obvious to me
why? I'll tell you, as I live in norway, I cannot get any release that is
*only* released in the US, unless I get someone to send that to me.
so by your definition this release should not be available to me, but is it
not? I can get it fine. so
testy testy test!
~ mo the tester
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
ok, I and shep have now implemented member of subtypes with instrument and
vocal on TEST
for example: http://test.musicbrainz.org/showartist.html?artistid=317529
the types generalities are
[artist] is/was a{additional:n additional} {instrument} performing member of
[artist], reverse: [artist]
