RE: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Conkling > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 2:00 PM > To: MusicBrainz style discussion > Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY' > > On 11/28/06, MLL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

On 11/28/06, MLL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Marco Sola a écrit : > Il Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:31 AM > mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > >> Just take care of not scaring away good-will newcomers by reverting >> their changes, a quick mail to explain the revert would suffice i >> think.

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

Marco Sola a écrit : Il Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:31 AM mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: Just take care of not scaring away good-will newcomers by reverting their changes, a quick mail to explain the revert would suffice i think. Yes, I could have been more communicative. Looks like

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

Il Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:31 AM mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: Just take care of not scaring away good-will newcomers by reverting their changes, a quick mail to explain the revert would suffice i think. Yes, I could have been more communicative. Looks like Andrew reverted the rev

RE: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Marco Sola > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 9:52 PM > To: MusicBrainz style discussion > Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX

RE: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

> -Original Message- > From: Frederic Da Vitoria > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:09 PM > To: MusicBrainz style discussion > Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY' > > > > > Or even Mazurka No. 1/Op. 6

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Aaron Cooper wrote: > Doesn't 63/1 mean that the work has two different catalog numbers? Well, not always: MB uses "Hob III/28" (although far from consistently), which according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_string_quartets_by_Jose

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

Aaron Cooper wrote: On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Marco Sola wrote: > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' > around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not > part of this rule that is only about commas? > Spontaneous

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006/11/27, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2006/11/27, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2006/11/27, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Marco Sola wrote: > > > > > > > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006/11/27, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2006/11/27, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Marco Sola wrote: > > > > > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' > > > around: are they allowed? should th

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006/11/27, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marco Sola wrote: > > > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' > > around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not > > part of this rule that i

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

mll wrote: 1) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' OR 2) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63, No. 1' Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not part of this rule that is only about commas? 3) 'Mazurka in B m

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Marco Sola wrote: > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' > around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not > part of this rule that is only about commas? > Spontaneously, I'd say, no, they

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) Two acceptable forms is (are?) one more than is needed. 2) Having two will surely be confusing to some, especially new users. We risk getting multi-disc releases which are internally or series-wise inconsistent. 3) For those who'd like to se

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

Marco Sola wrote: Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not part of this rule that is only about commas? Spontaneously, I'd say, no, they should not be allowed, and, yes, the existing ones shou

RE: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

> -Original Message- > From: Marco Sola > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 7:55 PM > To: MusicBrainz style discussion > Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY' > > Il Monday, November 27, 2006 6:47 PM > mll <

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

Il Monday, November 27, 2006 6:47 PM mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: the case where a track is numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' (example at http://musicbrainz.org/track/576a7830-8240-4611-804c-256ee0e4bce3.html). I can see to ways of expressing it: 1) 'Ma