Sent from Samsung Mobile___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
2012/1/29 pabouk
> I agree with most of the contributors that the recording title
> should not follow the track title.
> If the track titles should follow what is written on album
> covers then we would lose means for tagging tracks using
> normalized titles.
>
>
Did you see my suggestion about a
I agree with most of the contributors that the recording title
should not follow the track title.
If the track titles should follow what is written on album
covers then we would lose means for tagging tracks using
normalized titles.
Unfortunately the current MB implementation makes creation
of new
2012/1/28 lorenz pressler
>
> what about whenever linking a recording to a work (where recording-title
> != work-title) that we give the editor the question "Do you want to rename
> the recording title to work title?". maybe with the possibility to alter
> the name during that process (eg. if its
2012/1/28 symphonick
>
> 2012/1/27 Frederic Da Vitoria
>
>> 2012/1/27, Lemire, Sebastien :
>> >>
>> >> The biggest problem with using work titles is mismatch problems. Track
>> >> boundaries can be very different from works (opera could potentially
>> fail
>> >> completely).
>> >
>> > I don't se
what about whenever linking a recording to a work (where recording-title
!= work-title) that we give the editor the question "Do you want to rename
the recording title to work title?". maybe with the possibility to alter
the name during that process (eg. if its a partial performance)?
best,
2012/1/27 Frederic Da Vitoria
> 2012/1/27, Lemire, Sebastien :
> >>
> >> The biggest problem with using work titles is mismatch problems. Track
> >> boundaries can be very different from works (opera could potentially
> fail
> >> completely).
> >
> > I don't see a problem, basically we should kee
2012/1/27, Lemire, Sebastien :
>>
>> The biggest problem with using work titles is mismatch problems. Track
>> boundaries can be very different from works (opera could potentially fail
>> completely).
>
> I don't see a problem, basically we should keep the CSG naming convention
> for recordings whi
>
> The biggest problem with using work titles is mismatch problems. Track
> boundaries can be very different from works (opera could potentially fail
> completely).
I don't see a problem, basically we should keep the CSG naming convention
for recordings while of course modifying it slightly to a
2012/1/26 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Rupert Swarbrick
> wrote:
> > Alex Mauer writes:
> >> I believe more common practice is to use the most common linked track
> >> title; using the work title is another viable option, as mentioned
> >> above. (it’s not the o
2012/1/26 Lemire, Sebastien
> IMHO the recording should discussed in a separate thread.
>
> I completely disagree that the Recording titles should match the track
> titles.
>
> You already brought the issue of multiple languages, but another issue is
> that for many very famous recordings, they a
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Rupert Swarbrick wrote:
> Alex Mauer writes:
>> I believe more common practice is to use the most common linked track
>> title; using the work title is another viable option, as mentioned
>> above. (it’s not the only workable solution though)
>
> And the fact tha
Alex Mauer writes:
> I believe more common practice is to use the most common linked track
> title; using the work title is another viable option, as mentioned
> above. (it’s not the only workable solution though)
And the fact that most people go "meh, whatever" about recording titles
suggests
On 01/26/2012 02:10 PM, Lemire, Sebastien wrote:
> I completely disagree that the Recording titles should match the track
> titles.
>
> I think the recording titles should match the work titles instead. It's
> the only workable solution. One style, regardless of release label or
> language.
I agre
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Lemire, Sebastien wrote:
> Hmm maybe it was a separate thread already, my bad ;)
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Lemire, Sebastien wrote:
>>
>> IMHO the recording should discussed in a separate thread.
>>
>> I completely disagree that the Recording titles
Hmm maybe it was a separate thread already, my bad ;)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Lemire, Sebastien wrote:
> IMHO the recording should discussed in a separate thread.
>
> I completely disagree that the Recording titles should match the track
> titles.
>
> You already brought the issue of mu
IMHO the recording should discussed in a separate thread.
I completely disagree that the Recording titles should match the track
titles.
You already brought the issue of multiple languages, but another issue is
that for many very famous recordings, they are re-released on multiple
releases of the
Next: recording titles.
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick/recordingnames_preRFC
--
/symphonick
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
18 matches
Mail list logo
