Please ignore the long email - I sent that 8 1/2 days ago, but it
seems the list-management software sat on it until only just this
morning. :(
Brian
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.or
I appreciate the response - quite obviously thought went into it. However,
I admit, I find it rather confusing, and somewhat contradictory, and I
really just have to disagree here.
>> In my opinion, any concept of a release language, for classical, is
>> rather bogus.
>
>The MBReleaseLanguage can
Lauri Watts wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2008 11:05 PM, Leiv Hellebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>> >> Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
>> >>> My big obstacle in discussing ReleaseLanguage is that I don't have a
>> clue
>> >>> why we're recording that data, what problem it's trying to solve.
>> >> I guess you
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
A private email I received spurred me to take a look and see just in
an effort to show exactly how we're making our work redundantly more
difficult by not standardizing classical listing language,
Yes there are a lot of dupes, no surprises there, and I believe you are
r
A private email I received spurred me to take a look and see just in
an effort to show exactly how we're making our work redundantly more
difficult by not standardizing classical listing language, I took a
break from list-making, and gave myself a hard limit of 30 minutes,
and went to see how many
On Jan 27, 2008 11:05 PM, Leiv Hellebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
> >
> > Leiv Hellebo-2 wrote:
>
> (Huh? If I am LH-2, then who is LH-1?)
>
> >> Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
> >>> My big obstacle in discussing ReleaseLanguage is that I don't have a clue
> >>> why we're recording that
Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
Leiv Hellebo-2 wrote:
(Huh? If I am LH-2, then who is LH-1?)
Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
My big obstacle in discussing ReleaseLanguage is that I don't have a clue
why we're recording that data, what problem it's trying to solve.
I guess you would have problems with distinguishi
Leiv Hellebo-2 wrote:
>
> Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
>> My big obstacle in discussing ReleaseLanguage is that I don't have a clue
>> why we're recording that data, what problem it's trying to solve.
>
> I guess you would have problems with distinguishing between Danish and
> Norwegian, or between vari
Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
My big obstacle in discussing ReleaseLanguage is that I don't have a clue
why we're recording that data, what problem it's trying to solve.
I guess you would have problems with distinguishing between Danish and
Norwegian, or between various Slavic languages... But with the
Jim,
Well put - that's essentially the core of what I'm suggesting. The
track/work title on classical releases is essentially a generic title; hence
why we do get so many lazy releases with just tempos - "here's a basic work
ID, here's just barely enough to ID what's on each track"; or the conver
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>
> In my opinion, any concept of a release language, for classical [and
> opera], is rather bogus.Any decent non-budget release (Naxos, Philips,
> etc) tends to list either multiple languages or single listings in a mix
> of languages. We've typically selected one,
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
This began as a private message to leivhe, but it got long enough, and
detailed enough, I figured it'd be better to just send to to the style
list...
Note - "CSG" here I also mean to encompass Opera Style.
In my opinion, any concep
On Jan 25, 2008 9:49 AM, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So, I suggest, rather than "choose one out of the four languages on your
> CD as the one to use", or the debates (like one recently) over what language
> to use when essentially there is no release language for a classical CD,
That would be a very good application of the "alternate titles"
feature I proposed a while back :)
On Jan 25, 2008 9:49 AM, Brian Schweitzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This began as a private message to leivhe, but it got long enough, and
> detailed enough, I figured it'd be better to just send
This began as a private message to leivhe, but it got long enough, and
detailed enough, I figured it'd be better to just send to to the style
list...
Note - "CSG" here I also mean to encompass Opera Style.
In my opinion, any concept of a release language, for
15 matches
Mail list logo
