Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-06 Thread jacobbrett
Calvin Walton-2 wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 05:20 -0700, jacobbrett wrote: On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like [none] to show the difference between this has no cat#, and I know that and I don't

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-06 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:17 PM, jacobbrett jacobbr...@hotmail.com wrote: Calvin Walton-2 wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 05:20 -0700, jacobbrett wrote: On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like [none] to show

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-06 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2011/6/6, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:17 PM, jacobbrett jacobbr...@hotmail.com wrote: Calvin Walton-2 wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 05:20 -0700, jacobbrett wrote: On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: I was wondering if it

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-06 Thread StoneyBoh
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing, but I note that I've edited at least five releases (usually small, independent) that had no printed barcode, but one attributed to them online somewhere (Amazon, other retailer or label). Yeah; in a some of these cases the barcode allocated this way seems to

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-02 Thread jacobbrett
swisschris wrote: +1 having [none] as an option would make even more sense IMHO for the barcode field: lots of early or auto-produced or small label releases come without and this would spare us the time to search/ask for one where there isn't ;-) 2011/6/1 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-02 Thread Calvin Walton
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 05:20 -0700, jacobbrett wrote: On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like [none] to show the difference between this has no cat#, and I know that and I don't know if this has a cat#. Any

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-01 Thread caller#6
On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like [none] to show the difference between this has no cat#, and I know that and I don't know if this has a cat#. Any opinions on the matter? Are there examples of a Release

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-01 Thread Mark Trolley
All of the Daytrotter Session releases use Daytrotter.com as the label but have no cat#. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:14 PM, caller#6 meatbyproduct-musicbra...@yahoo.com wrote: On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-01 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:14 PM, caller#6 meatbyproduct-musicbra...@yahoo.com wrote: On 06/01/2011 10:00 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like [none] to show the difference between this has no cat#, and I know that and I don't know

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-01 Thread SwissChris
+1 having [none] as an option would make even more sense IMHO for the barcode field: lots of early or auto-produced or small label releases come without and this would spare us the time to search/ask for one where there isn't ;-) 2011/6/1 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com On Wed,

Re: [mb-style] [none] as a cat#?

2011-06-01 Thread Rob Keeney
I have numerous examples of small indie labels w/ no cat# (no UPC either, especially for anything prior to 1980 or so). +1 Rob.. On 6/1/2011 1:00 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: I was wondering if it would be useful to adopt something like [none] to show the difference