--- Age Bosma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> > Right, there is the problem of the order too. I
> guess what is on the
> > sleeve would be the most obvious choice, because
> we can't ask users to
> > do musicological researches each time!
> >
> > But my question (which
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Right, there is the problem of the order too. I guess what is on the
sleeve would be the most obvious choice, because we can't ask users to
do musicological researches each time!
But my question (which I realize I didn't ask here) was about
formatting. Citing Prodoc in
Right, there is the problem of the order too. I guess what is on the
sleeve would be the most obvious choice, because we can't ask users to
do musicological researches each time!
But my question (which I realize I didn't ask here) was about
formatting. Citing Prodoc in CSGDiscussion:
* 'KV 381
perhaps the most recent number should be used? this is usually when the catalog is *changed*OR we can use the number that was current at the time of the recordingor, just whatever's printed on the disc sleeve
On 5/11/06, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Funny how things which never o
Funny how things which never occurred for months suddenly appear repeatedly :-)
Recently we had two cases where a same work has two different numbers
in the same catalog. Prodoc has asked how this should be entered in
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuideDiscussion, but he got
only my a
