2011/11/25 Alex Mauer
> On 11/25/2011 03:22 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> > So, you seem to be saying don't store a time for the vinyl because if
> > you have a time for a cd release that is going to be better, that just
> > isn't true. Somebody may have put in an accurate Vinyl time, and someone
> >
On 25/11/2011 19:12, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 11/25/2011 03:22 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>> So, you seem to be saying don't store a time for the vinyl because if
>> you have a time for a cd release that is going to be better, that just
>> isn't true. Somebody may have put in an accurate Vinyl time, and
On 11/25/2011 03:22 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> So, you seem to be saying don't store a time for the vinyl because if
> you have a time for a cd release that is going to be better, that just
> isn't true. Somebody may have put in an accurate Vinyl time, and someone
> else an incorrect CD time.
Basica
On 24/11/2011 17:55, Alex Mauer wrote:
On 11/24/2011 4:29 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
We don't actually add release times, just track times so I don't see
that this is that relevant,
It's relevant to the last track of each side, no?
Surely the point at which it reaches the last groove is the end
T
2011/11/24 Alex Mauer
> On 11/24/2011 4:29 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> > Treating analog different to digital is a bad idea. But it might be
> > worth revisiting why we need track times AND recording times for CD's,
> > when do they actually differ ?
>
> They differ from one release to another, simp
On 11/24/2011 4:29 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>>> We don't actually add release times, just track times so I don't see
>>> that this is that relevant,
>> It’s relevant to the last track of each side, no?
> Surely the point at which it reaches the last groove is the end
The point it which it reaches th
On 23/11/2011 18:01, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 05:11 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>>> The situation is:
>>> * phonograph records (in particular) have no clearly-defined duration
>>> (especially since the last groove locks and loops forever
>> We don't actually add release times, just track times
On 11/23/2011 05:11 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>> The situation is:
>> * phonograph records (in particular) have no clearly-defined duration
>> (especially since the last groove locks and loops forever
> We don't actually add release times, just track times so I don't see
> that this is that relevant,
On 18/11/2011 17:54, Alex Mauer wrote:
Discussion on IRC[1] brought up the idea that perhaps it would be useful
to remove the possibility of setting track durations from releases which
don’t have clearly-defined track boundaries or durations (I believe this
is mostly analog releases, but there ma
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 02:48:59PM -0600, Alex Mauer wrote:
> > But if someone really went through the effort as to identify vinyl track
> > durations, I think they should be allowed to enter this information.
>
> I like the thought, but I’m not sure how you could say that the track
> durations w
On 11/21/2011 12:30 PM, Johannes Weißl wrote:
> I really like this idea, I think through the NGS update almost all track
> durations for vinyl albums are worthless (because they shared one
> tracklist with a CD release).
>
> But if someone really went through the effort as to identify vinyl track
>
Hello Alex,
+1
I really like this idea, I think through the NGS update almost all track
durations for vinyl albums are worthless (because they shared one
tracklist with a CD release).
But if someone really went through the effort as to identify vinyl track
durations, I think they should be allow
On 18 November 2011 22:00, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 02:31 PM, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
>> My immediate feeling is that this would cause more problems than it
>> would solve. The primary advantage of having analog recording track
>> times is for recording merging purposes. Without track ti
On 11/18/2011 02:31 PM, Per Øyvind Øygard wrote:
> My immediate feeling is that this would cause more problems than it
> would solve. The primary advantage of having analog recording track
> times is for recording merging purposes. Without track times you risk
> accidentally merging recordings whic
On 18 November 2011 18:54, Alex Mauer wrote:
> Discussion on IRC[1] brought up the idea that perhaps it would be useful
> to remove the possibility of setting track durations from releases which
> don’t have clearly-defined track boundaries or durations (I believe this
> is mostly analog releases,
Discussion on IRC[1] brought up the idea that perhaps it would be useful
to remove the possibility of setting track durations from releases which
don’t have clearly-defined track boundaries or durations (I believe this
is mostly analog releases, but there may be some exceptions in either
direct
16 matches
Mail list logo
