2013/1/4 Frederik Freso S. Olesen musicbra...@freso.dk
Den 04-01-2013 08:04, Kuno Woudt skrev:
On 01/03/2013 11:52 PM, Ben Ockmore wrote:
I would say so - I don't see any reason why not, they can be copyrighted
just as much as recordings...
I'm not sure a work as we use it in musicbrainz
Den 04-01-2013 00:34, Duke Yin skrev:
2) ability to assign arbitrary years to the relationship. e.g., some
albums may say (P)2003,2004,2006 Record Company, skipping 2005,
depending on the old tracks included in the album.
This is already possible, in the same way it's possible to state that
Den 04-01-2013 08:04, Kuno Woudt skrev:
On 01/03/2013 11:52 PM, Ben Ockmore wrote:
I would say so - I don't see any reason why not, they can be copyrighted
just as much as recordings...
I'm not sure a work as we use it in musicbrainz is a copyrightable
thing, it seems to abstract.
Huh? Works
Expected expiration date: January 13, 2013
I think it's relevant for a music encyclopedia to have data about copyright
and phonographic copyright: the copyright holders of a release or a
recording (and its date). They can be the label or other entities, or the
artist. I think most releases have
Shouldn't start date indicate the year the copyright was taken out, and end
date the year it expires (where available)?
Also, I think this should also apply to works, not just recordings and
releases.
--
View this message in context:
On Jan 3, 2013, at 1:44 PM, daniel. wrote:
I think it's relevant for a music encyclopedia to have data about copyright
and phonographic copyright: the copyright holders of a release or a recording
(and its date). They can be the label or other entities, or the artist. I
think most
So, should I include works in the proposal for this relationship?
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
I would say so - I don't see any reason why not, they can be copyrighted
just as much as recordings...
Another thing I thought of a minute ago - is it possible for a work or
recordings to be copyrighted by different people/labels in different
countries?
In my opinion, any new Copyright relationship needs to address the
following, regardless of if it's a Recording or Release relationship:
1) clear distinction (at least two relationship types) between
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_symbol and
My proposal is to have Copyright relationship type + Phonographic Copyright
relationship subtype.
I've added country attribute and works (copyright only) to the proposal
wiki.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
On 01/03/2013 11:52 PM, Ben Ockmore wrote:
I would say so - I don't see any reason why not, they can be copyrighted
just as much as recordings...
I'm not sure a work as we use it in musicbrainz is a copyrightable
thing, it seems to abstract.
You cannot copyright ideas, only expressions of
11 matches
Mail list logo
