2008/12/19 Jason :
> Why would you enforce a www?
you wouldn't enforce it as such, but to remove it from the address is bad
http://www.nabble.com/Website-urls%3A-to-www.-or-not-td10420197s2885i20.html#a10457449
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Mu
On Dec 19, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Jason wrote:
>> Why would you enforce a www?
>> International subdomains matter for the user. You'll piss people
>> off if you
>> force them to English "International" YouTube, since they'll have
>> to relo
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Jason wrote:
> Why would you enforce a www?
> International subdomains matter for the user. You'll piss people off if you
> force them to English "International" YouTube, since they'll have to reload
> the whole page just to get the different social networks they l
the
way to go.
From: Jason
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Sent: Friday, 19 December, 2008 17:29:38
Subject: Re: [mb-style] RFC: New AR for linking to official artist/label
YouTube pages
Why would you enforce a www?
International subdomains matter for the user. You'll pi
w.youtube.com/user/blargh
or http://www.youtube.com/channelname and not http://[de|whatever
subdomain].youtube.com/
From: Lukáš Lalinský
To: MusicBrainz style discussion >
Sent: Friday, 19 December, 2008 11:00:50
Subject: [mb-style] RFC: New AR for linking to official artist/label
YouTube p
www.youtube.com/channelname and not http://[de|whatever
subdomain].youtube.com/
From: Lukáš Lalinský
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Sent: Friday, 19 December, 2008 11:00:50
Subject: [mb-style] RFC: New AR for linking to official artist/label YouTube
See http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/2730 -- can anybody think of
any reasons to not add it?
--
Lukas Lalinsky
lalin...@gmail.com
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/
