Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-16 Thread Don Redman
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:47:31 +0200, Jason Bouwmeester wrote: Meanwhile, do you think I should take this promo only thing to an RFV? I'm still a bit confused about the exact procedure (or if this even needs to go through the whole formal process, if we're gonna have "style guidelines lite" for s

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-16 Thread Jason Bouwmeester
Meanwhile, do you think I should take this promo only thing to an RFV? I'm still a bit confused about the exact procedure (or if this even needs to go through the whole formal process, if we're gonna have "style guidelines lite" for series styles) Confused as well but from what I gather this is

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-16 Thread Lauri Watts
On 10/16/06, Jason Bouwmeester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Series" is a name that comes to my mind. > > That would mean to change OCRREmixStyle to ORCRemixSeries and to create a > SpecialSeriesStyle page that lists all series on which a decision has been > made here. > > OK, it's a bit of work,

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-16 Thread Jason Bouwmeester
"Series" is a name that comes to my mind. That would mean to change OCRREmixStyle to ORCRemixSeries and to create a SpecialSeriesStyle page that lists all series on which a decision has been made here. OK, it's a bit of work, but it makes sense. It would separate specific guidelines from geneal

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-16 Thread Don Redman
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 07:33:06 +0200, Michelle . wrote: This looks good. The only "problem" I have with the proposal is that I think it shouldn't be a StyleGuideline as such. It seems to me that style guidelines apply more generally, while this only applies to a small subset of releases. Pe

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-14 Thread Jason Bouwmeester
This was put forth from the number of these, as well as from previous... standards(?) set for the OC Remix Style - http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/OCReMixStyle. ~jb On 10/13/06, Michelle . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This looks good. The only "problem" I have with the proposal is that I think it sho

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-13 Thread Michelle .
This looks good. The only "problem" I have with the proposal is that I think it shouldn't be a StyleGuideline as such. It seems to me that style guidelines apply more generally, while this only applies to a small subset of releases. Perhaps PromoOnlyStyle and HelloProjectStyle should be in a n

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-13 Thread Jason Bouwmeester
Looks and sounds good Lauri, I noticed that some of the stuff was covered in the wiki and the images after I made my post - teach me to post before reading/viewing everything! ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org ht

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-13 Thread Lauri Watts
On 10/13/06, Jason Bouwmeester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Original proposal: > > Summary: I'd like to standardise the naming of this very big set of > releases, to the following: > > I suggest this naming scheme: > Promo Only: {series name}, {month} {expanded year} > > Giving for example: > "Pr

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-13 Thread Jason Bouwmeester
Original proposal: Summary: I'd like to standardise the naming of this very big set of releases, to the following: I suggest this naming scheme: Promo Only: {series name}, {month} {expanded year} Giving for example: "Promo Only: Modern Rock Radio, October 2006" "Promo Only: Dance Club, April 20

[mb-style] RFC: Proposal for "Promo Only Style"

2006-10-13 Thread Lauri Watts
While still quite confused about which of the various 'this is how you propose a style guideline" pages to follow, I figure I may as well start somewhere. There's already been some discussion on this on the -users list, and I have copied below my original post on the matter. Here is the newborn