Expected RFV: 2013-09-03 20:00 UTC
Whosampled.com is a moderated database of samples, covers and
interpolations. It describes the links between 'tracks' (basically our
recordings) with details of when the samples appear and linked videos.
Contributions are only displayed after being checked by a m
Looks good to me.
--
View this message in context:
http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-240-add-whosampled-to-other-db-whitelist-tp4657248p4657259.html
Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
MusicBrain
Is that a +1?
:-)
On Aug 27, 2013 10:59 PM, "lixobix" wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-240-add-whosampled-to-other-db-whitelist-tp4657248p4657259.html
> Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive
+1 :)
--
View this message in context:
http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-STYLE-240-add-whosampled-to-other-db-whitelist-tp4657248p4657263.html
Sent from the MusicBrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
MusicBrainz-style mail
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Tom Crocker wrote:
> Is that a +1?
> :-)
>
Dunno, but this is:
+1
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/m
Thank you both!
On Aug 27, 2013 11:14 PM, "Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren"
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Tom Crocker wrote:
>
>> Is that a +1?
>> :-)
>>
>
> Dunno, but this is:
>
> +1
>
> --
> Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
>
> ___
> MusicBrainz-style
On Aug 27, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Tom Crocker wrote:
> Thank you both!
>
+1 from me too. I'm fine-tuning the framework for an interpolation relationship
type so we can make the most of this site.
> On Aug 27, 2013 11:14 PM, "Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren"
> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:02 AM,
On Aug 29, 2013 2:39 AM, "Rachel Dwight" wrote:
>
> +1 from me too. I'm fine-tuning the framework for an interpolation
relationship type so we can make the most of this site.
>
That'll be great. I'm currently using partial cover where it's at the
recording level or 'is based on' at work, but nei
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:02:09AM +0100, Tom Crocker wrote:
> That'll be great. I'm currently using partial cover where it's at the
> recording level or 'is based on' at work, but neither seem ideal for the
> smaller stuff. Good luck and let me know if you want a hand thinking it
> through.
There
Yeah, but I'd only use sample if it was a genuine sample (i.e. from a
recording). Where they just repeat or rework a line from another work, etc.
I was guessing that would be where I'd use interpolation?
On 29 August 2013 07:40, th1rtyf0ur wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:02:09AM +0100, Tom
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:57:30AM +0100, Tom Crocker wrote:
> Yeah, but I'd only use sample if it was a genuine sample (i.e. from a
> recording). Where they just repeat or rework a line from another work,
> etc. I was guessing that would be where I'd use interpolation?
Ah, I see now. That's what
:-)
On 29 August 2013 09:09, th1rtyf0ur wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:57:30AM +0100, Tom Crocker wrote:
> > Yeah, but I'd only use sample if it was a genuine sample (i.e. from a
> > recording). Where they just repeat or rework a line from another work,
> > etc. I was guessing that would b
12 matches
Mail list logo
