Re: [mb-style] RFC: STYLE-331 "add 'composite reissue' relationship" -- compilation?

2014-08-26 Thread Tom Crocker
As came up in the box set dicussion [1] Would it be useful to optionally include the source and/or target primary type? e.g. forward phrase: Songs for Drella available as part of the box set Original Album Series

Re: [mb-style] RFC: STYLE-331 "add 'composite reissue' relationship" -- compilation?

2014-08-24 Thread Tom Crocker
On 24 Aug 2014 05:30, "Daniel Sobey" wrote: > > Would it make sense to include the medium? > Medium 1 is available as part of release group. > For the moment I think the proposal is RG to RG only so indicating the medium wouldn't make sense. In the long run having a RG to Release version would be

Re: [mb-style] RFC: STYLE-331 "add 'composite reissue' relationship" -- compilation?

2014-08-23 Thread Daniel Sobey
Would it make sense to include the medium? Medium 1 is available as part of release group. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Re: [mb-style] RFC: STYLE-331 "add 'composite reissue' relationship" -- compilation?

2014-08-22 Thread Tom Crocker
On 22 Aug 2014 18:41, "caller#6" wrote: > > On 08/13/2014 11:08 PM, Tom Crocker wrote: > > > > Just in case it wasn't clear from my last post, I was suggesting > > calling the relationship "available on" (not just the link text) in > > the same way "single from" is called that. Then you avoid the

Re: [mb-style] RFC: STYLE-331 "add 'composite reissue' relationship" -- compilation?

2014-08-22 Thread caller#6
On 08/13/2014 11:08 PM, Tom Crocker wrote: > > Just in case it wasn't clear from my last post, I was suggesting > calling the relationship "available on" (not just the link text) in > the same way "single from" is called that. Then you avoid the problem > with compilation you mentioned of an old

Re: [mb-style] RFC: STYLE-331 "add 'composite reissue' relationship" -- compilation?

2014-08-13 Thread Tom Crocker
Just in case it wasn't clear from my last post, I was suggesting calling the relationship "available on" (not just the link text) in the same way "single from" is called that. Then you avoid the problem with compilation you mentioned of an old EP being reissued with lots of new material and a new n

Re: [mb-style] RFC: STYLE-331 "add 'composite reissue' relationship" -- compilation?

2014-08-07 Thread caller#6
On 08/07/2014 09:57 AM, Tom Crocker wrote: On 7 August 2014 17:16, caller#6 > wrote: the "release group that includes other release groups" might not be a compilation or box set. An EP might be added to an album reissue and be considered "bonus tracks

Re: [mb-style] RFC: STYLE-331 "add 'composite reissue' relationship" -- compilation?

2014-08-07 Thread Tom Crocker
On 7 August 2014 17:16, caller#6 wrote: > > the "release group that includes other release groups" might not be a > compilation or box set. An EP might be added to an album reissue and be > considered "bonus tracks" rather than a 2-in-1. I have no idea how common > this is, but it seems possible

Re: [mb-style] RFC: STYLE-331 "add 'composite reissue' relationship" -- compilation?

2014-08-07 Thread caller#6
On 08/06/2014 11:17 AM, caller#6 wrote: Hi all, This proposal would add a relationship linking original release-groups with what I'm calling 'composite reissues', (e.g. box sets, 2-in1s etc). [snip] I'm not super-happy with the term 'composite reissue'. Please suggest something better! (I'