Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

On 1/27/2014 6:02 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > So, any strong opposition to move USB and slotMusic under "Other" > instead? I'll give it a couple more days (until the 30 or so) and RFV if > I have received at least a +1 for this specific change and no strong > opposition :) +1

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

So, any strong opposition to move USB and slotMusic under "Other" instead? I'll give it a couple more days (until the 30 or so) and RFV if I have received at least a +1 for this specific change and no strong opposition :) ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing lis

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Alex Mauer wrote: > On 01/20/2014 11:29 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > > Under *that* point of view, they shouldn't necessarily be listed > > together just because of it anyway, since those three aren't. > > Heh, fair enough. > > Maybe they should both be

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

On 01/20/2014 11:29 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > Under *that* point of view, they shouldn't necessarily be listed > together just because of it anyway, since those three aren't. Heh, fair enough. Maybe they should both be placed under “other” given how rare they are? Especially so for

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

Hello Style Council! On 01/20/2014 06:20 PM, Alex Mauer wrote: > On 01/20/2014 04:04 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: >> "Digital Media" is effectively "Download" - but having USB and slotMusic >> (microSD) under it makes it much less obvious. The current hierarchy >> never went through style.

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Alex Mauer wrote: > On 01/20/2014 11:22 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > > Under that point of view, they are packagings, not formats, and should > > just disappear from the format tree. Which I'd also probably agree with, > > myself, but if they were put th

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

On 01/20/2014 11:22 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > Under that point of view, they are packagings, not formats, and should > just disappear from the format tree. Which I'd also probably agree with, > myself, but if they were put there I imagine it's because someone > considered them formats.

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Alex Mauer wrote: > On 01/20/2014 04:04 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > > "Digital Media" is effectively "Download" - but having USB and slotMusic > > (microSD) under it makes it much less obvious. The current hierarchy > > never went through style. Discuss

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

On 01/20/2014 04:04 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: > "Digital Media" is effectively "Download" - but having USB and slotMusic > (microSD) under it makes it much less obvious. The current hierarchy > never went through style. Discussion of STYLE-177 >

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

+1 Let's keep "Digital Media" for downloads, since the term is well established and accepted (maybe adding explicitly "no physical support"), and sort USB and slot music under the physical media as suggested. On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren < reosare...@gmail.com> wro

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Staffan Vilcans wrote: > > Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren skrev: > > >> > "Digital Media" is effectively "Download" > >> > >> Usually yes, but it can also be sent via other methods like e-mail. > >> Calling it "file" would perhaps be more universal. > >> Technically spe

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren skrev: >> > "Digital Media" is effectively "Download" >> >> Usually yes, but it can also be sent via other methods like e-mail. >> Calling it "file" would perhaps be more universal. >> Technically speaking CDs are also digital media. > > I'm not suggesting renaming it, I

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Staffan Vilcans wrote: > > Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren skrev: > > > "Digital Media" is effectively "Download" > > Usually yes, but it can also be sent via other methods like e-mail. > Calling it "file" would perhaps be more universal. > Technically speaking CDs are

Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren skrev: > "Digital Media" is effectively "Download" Usually yes, but it can also be sent via other methods like e-mail. Calling it "file" would perhaps be more universal. Technically speaking CDs are also digital media. -- http://www.interface1.net __

[mb-style] RFC STYLE-287: Move USB and slotMusic formats out of Digital Media

"Digital Media" is effectively "Download" - but having USB and slotMusic (microSD) under it makes it much less obvious. The current hierarchy never went through style. Discussion of STYLE-177 suggested "flattening" the structure and moving USB and sl