On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:34 AM, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 03/02/2012 03:32 PM, SwissChris wrote:
Well, how should we know? This feature definitely wasn't there from the
beginning of NGS, when the
Ok, it makes sense. I agree that ARs can't be avoided and that
entering Artist Credits is no excuse for not entering ARs. But I have
still another question: what means artist credit outside classical?
How is it different from ARs? Why did we implement ARs and (long)
after add Artist Credit?
Hello,
On 02/03/12 04:01, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Ok, it makes sense. I agree that ARs can't be avoided and that
entering Artist Credits is no excuse for not entering ARs. But I have
still another question: what means artist credit outside classical?
How is it different from ARs? Why did
2012/3/2, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl:
Hello,
On 02/03/12 04:01, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Ok, it makes sense. I agree that ARs can't be avoided and that
entering Artist Credits is no excuse for not entering ARs. But I have
still another question: what means artist credit outside classical?
2012/3/2, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl:
Hello,
On 02/03/12 04:01, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Ok, it makes sense. I agree that ARs can't be avoided and that
entering Artist Credits is no excuse for not entering ARs. But I have
still another question: what means artist credit outside classical?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/2, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl:
Hello,
On 02/03/12 04:01, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Ok, it makes sense. I agree that ARs can't be avoided and that
entering Artist Credits is no excuse for not entering ARs. But
On 03/02/2012 05:33 AM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
Hello,
On 02/03/12 04:01, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
[snip]... But I have
still another question: what means artist credit outside classical?
How is it different from ARs? Why did we implement ARs and (long)
after add Artist Credit?
disclaimer:
2012/3/2 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
Classical editors now should definitely install
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/118491 (allows to turn all credits
from the release one to the composer by editing only one of them,
apart from the main use of copying ACs)
Looks
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:07 PM, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/2 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
Classical editors now should definitely install
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/118491 (allows to turn all credits
from the release one to the composer by
2012/3/2 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:26 AM, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
(snip)
And then you have to add relationships (much more useful than simple
artist
credits) one by one, which is bad for every edit. For classical, and even
On 03/02/2012 03:32 PM, SwissChris wrote:
Well, how should we know? This feature definitely wasn't there from the
beginning of NGS, when the previously existing possibility to add ARs to
several tracks at once was disabled. It must have been recently
implemented by the devs (thanks!) – but
jesus2099 hta3s836gzac...@jetable.org
writes:
Could you briefly explain the before→after differences ?
Thanks :)
At the moment, there is not a CSG at all. This describes how release
artists should be formatted. So the diff is quite easy to compute :-)
Rupert
pgpIHQAU8jt3R.pgp
Description:
As said before several times I strongly dislike the mixing of composer and
performer names in an artist credit field unsuited for this. I still think
a specific composer field, inheriting data from works (or ARs) is the thing
we need. But since NGS (but for adding the Works concept) mostly ignored
Please explain what would be the suitable use? Does printing a name on a
cover not mean crediting? If not, what would mean artist credit in a
classical release (if it has a meaning, of course)?
2012/3/1 SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com
As said before several times I strongly dislike the mixing
This RFV has passed. We have to look into creating a CSG frontpage soon.
2012/3/1 Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com
Please explain what would be the suitable use? Does printing a name on a
cover not mean crediting? If not, what would mean artist credit in a
classical release (if it has
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
Please explain what would be the suitable use? Does printing a name on a
cover not mean crediting? If not, what would mean artist credit in a
classical release (if it has a meaning, of course)?
I don't think
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:26 AM, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please explain what would be the suitable use? Does printing a name on a
cover not mean crediting? If not, what would mean artist credit in
Could you briefly explain the before→after differences ?
Thanks :)
-
mb : http://musicbrainz.org/user/jesus2099
mb userscripts : http://userscripts.org/users/31010/scripts
black hole : *@jetable.org (stuff sent there won’t reach anyone)
crap® : jesus2099, Ti, Tristan, patate12, saucisson7,
http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-95
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:CSG2012/Release/Artist
This RFV will expire Friday, 2012-03-02.
/symphonick
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
