Thanks to +1 moving to RFV.
RFC discussion:
http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-261-Add-primary-concert-venue-relationship-between-artist-and-place-td4658830.html
This RFV will pass on November 1
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrain
I know it was me who +1ed this, but you don't seem to have discussed
anyone's concerns. I thought we were meant to try and achieve consensus?
And even if you want to keep the wording, ideas like adding some guidance
on the use of dates (here and in the premiere place AR) seem obviously
sensible, si
On 30.10.2013 10:38, Tom Crocker wrote:
> I know it was me who +1ed this, but you don't seem to have discussed
> anyone's concerns. I thought we were meant to try and achieve consensus?
There was 2 comments related to current wording. Feedback has been
basicly "sounds wierd" without any alternati
I'm not sure about the wording but I wouldn't worry too much about the
dates - once the relationship is added it won't really say "we don't know
how to use this" anymore :)
On 30 Oct 2013 12:39, "ListMyCDs.com" wrote:
> On 30.10.2013 10:38, Tom Crocker wrote:
> > I know it was me who +1ed this, b
On 30 October 2013 10:38, ListMyCDs.com wrote:
>
> Explanation for dates is commonly missing on mb wiki and seems it's not
> always necessary. For example:
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Performer_Relationship_Type &
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Chorus_Master_Relationship_Type
>
I know it's ofte
No, I mean that the place we put relationship documentation now doesn't
show "There's no guidance" - although I'm certainly not against providing
explicit guidance either :)
On 30 Oct 2013 13:33, "Tom Crocker" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 30 October 2013 10:38, ListMyCDs.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Explanation for
2013/10/30 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
> No, I mean that the place we put relationship documentation now doesn't
> show "There's no guidance" - although I'm certainly not against providing
> explicit guidance either :)
> On 30 Oct 2013 13:33, "Tom Crocker" wrote:
>
>>
>> On 30 October 2013 10:38,
The music i listen to doesn’t need this but that’s just my music and i’s
point of view. ;)
-
PATATE12, jesus2099, GOLD MASTER KING
sorry you can’t write to m...@jetable.org ← this is FAKE EMAIL ADDRESS !
--
View this message in context:
http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFV-261-Add-p
I only see some wording discussion here, but nobody seems to really be
against the *relationship* itself. So this has passed and I will add it -
feel free to have some extra discussions about the exact wording and that
can be improved later if desired :)
