On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:41:00AM +0100, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
The page underwent a major clearup lately and there have been no
objections as far as I can see, only remarks on details.
If anyone has some, please tell us now. :)
I've objected to it before because I find it messy and hard to
I've objected to it before because I find it messy and hard to read. I
much
prefer new lines instead of ' - ', they clearly show where one piece of
information ends and another begins and what information belongs to each
part.
i concur. thing is, it wasn't possible technically to do single
Nikki wrote:
I've objected to it before because I find it messy and hard to read. I much
prefer new lines instead of ' - ', they clearly show where one piece of
information ends and another begins and what information belongs to each
part.
An example,
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:55:04 +0100, Stefan Kestenholz wrote:
I've objected to it before because I find it messy and hard to read. I
much
prefer new lines instead of ' - ', they clearly show where one piece of
information ends and another begins and what information belongs to each
part.
i
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:56:37PM +0100, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
SPV 089-40700 DCD-E is the catalogue number of the distributor which is
called SPV.
Well, if *I* didn't understand it, I can't see a future parser having much
luck either. ;)
Did you read the discussion section on the page? I
Hi,
herewith I request http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ReleaseAnnotationStyle to
be made official.
The page underwent a major clearup lately and there have been no
objections as far as I can see, only remarks on details.
If anyone has some, please tell us now. :)
Simon (Shepard)
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:41:00 +0100, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Hi,
herewith I request http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ReleaseAnnotationStyle to
be made official.
The page underwent a major clearup lately and there have been no
objections as far as I can see, only remarks on details.
If anyone has
On 1/31/06, Don Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have any annotatoin style yet? Is this a good idea?
[...]
Is it ok if we make the general syntax official and leave the details in
the current state of informal recommendations?
The idea was just to add some rules to the specification of
Don Redman wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 04:10:38 +0100, Björn Krombholz wrote:
On 1/31/06, Don Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have any annotatoin style yet? Is this a good idea?
[...]
Is it ok if we make the general syntax official and leave the
details in
the current state of
On 1/31/06, Schika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really doubt that this is usefull - no to mention the parsing will
work, besides you code a parser using AI - it will end up in a mess.
No, that's why we wrote this little guideline. Every release info
that is in the defined format, can be parsed
10 matches
Mail list logo
