Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
We may then discover that we really ''don't'' have consensus on how a Type 1
AR behaves.
That is the problem I'm referring to; we probably /don't/ have
consensus. I don't think you'll ever get that about any "interesting"
style issue around here; everyone has their person
Bram:
Bram van Dijk wrote:
>
> Moreover, as the consensus seems to be that there is a consensus we
> could stop discussing start adding this to the documentation.
>
I sympathise with frustration at how unfocussed this all seems to be. But
there is a process for getting focus and reaching
Chris B schreef:
to be honest, i think this is a DBA issue. i mean, it's for ruoak
and/or lukz or whoever (sorry i know there are many involved but yes!)
to say how ARs relate to tracks. i can only look at it is from a
display issue and say what should be represented (which is where the
previous
Barry Platt schreef:
There is a list of all the different Track/Release AR types on my wiki
page http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/BarryPlatt which categorizes the ARs
into three types.
* Type 1 ARs are nominally track-level but would be considered to apply
to a subset of tracks on a release if
On 05/02/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that we just spent such a long time debating the concept, I was
> rather surprised this morning.
>
> http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=8315416
>
> An editor was adding 2 ARs to a release. Based on the long discussion
> we ju
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:41 -0800, David K. Gasaway wrote:
> I was left with the impression that there was a general consensus on
> the meaning of the ARs, but that the current UI is deficient. I
> assumed we'd continue as we are currently until something like Brian's
> mockups could be implem
On 5 Feb 2008 at 13:00, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> Yet dmppanda is responding that this guidance is incorrect, and
> suggesting that nothing at all was decided.
I was left with the impression that there was a general consensus on
the meaning of the ARs, but that the current UI is deficient. I
a
> My opinion: this kind of thing will go on and on until the
> style gurus/overlords start playing a more active part in
> discussions and making it easier to bring things to a
> conclusion in line with development plans; and facilitate the
> necessary changes being made to the documentation. O
Folks:
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>
> Given that we just spent such a long time debating the concept, I was
> rather surprised this morning. dmppanda is responding that this
> guidance [to attach performance ARs to tracks not the release] is
> incorrect, and suggesting that nothing at all was
Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
I may be deluded, but I do think there was something similar to the
consensus to apply AR:s to the track level when we know it to be true
of each track. What release level AR:s means still isn't very clear to
me, even if I have a firm opinion on what it ought to mean (bas
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 22:19 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> I may be deluded, but I do think there was something similar to the
> consensus to apply AR:s to the track level when we know it to be true
> of each track. What release level AR:s means still isn't very clear to
> me, even if I have a
I may be deluded, but I do think there was something similar to the
consensus to apply AR:s to the track level when we know it to be true
of each track. What release level AR:s means still isn't very clear to
me, even if I have a firm opinion on what it ought to mean (basically
what cooperaa just s
On 5-Feb-08, at 1:00 PM, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
Given that we just spent such a long time debating the concept, I was
rather surprised this morning.
http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=8315416
An editor was adding 2 ARs to a release. Based on the long discussion
we just recently had, I
Given that we just spent such a long time debating the concept, I was
rather surprised this morning.
http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/?editid=8315416
An editor was adding 2 ARs to a release. Based on the long discussion
we just recently had, I suggested that, since he had the information
to do s
14 matches
Mail list logo
