"cover of" should be an option and should go under the existing sub
group "covers or other versions"
Charlie Hunter Quartet - Natty Dread [1] _is a cover of_
Bob Marley - Natty Dread [2]
I've opened a ticket for this at
http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1097
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Cov
Brian Gurtler wrote:
"cover of" should be an option and should go under the existing sub
group "covers or other versions"
Charlie Hunter Quartet - Natty Dread [1] _is a cover of_
Bob Marley - Natty Dread [2]
I've opened a ticket for this at
http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1097
http://w
On 3/4/06, Lukáš Lalinský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Gurtler wrote:
> > "cover of" should be an option and should go under the existing sub
> > group "covers or other versions"
[...]
> > I've opened a ticket for this at
> > http://test.musicbrainz.org/trac/ticket/1097
> >
> > http://wiki.mu
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:44:28 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
Brian Gurtler wrote:
"cover of" should be an option and should go under the existing sub
group "covers or other versions"
Charlie Hunter Quartet - Natty Dread [1] _is a cover of_
Bob Marley - Natty Dread [2]
I've opened a ticket for th
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 22:36:07 +0100, Björn Krombholz"" wrote:
I don't think this needs any testing, as we know, that the cover-AR
types work well. Don?
Don does not have a say here (I am desperately avoiding to become a
bottleneck again).
But let me gather what seems to work and what does n
Don Redman wrote:
But let me gather what seems to work and what does not:
Brians first post can be seen as a "request for comment". You (Fuchs)
have suggested that the requestor should wait a week for comments.
Then Brian could issue a "request for veto", wait another 24 or 48 hours
(whatever s
The only reason why we didn't add an album-album version of the cover
type was, that we couldn't come up with an example.
I guess I should have been here last year...
http://musicbrainz.org/album/50b60c72-e11b-42f0-ac62-2798b8529048.html
Needless to name the original album. ;-)
Can't we ju
derGraph wrote:
The only reason why we didn't add an album-album version of the cover
type was, that we couldn't come up with an example.
I guess I should have been here last year...
http://musicbrainz.org/album/50b60c72-e11b-42f0-ac62-2798b8529048.html
Needless to name the original album. ;-
Don Redman schreef:
The link phrase sounds weirt to my (nonnative) ears: "Natty Dread is
covered by Natty Dread".
Is "by" correct? Would it not denote the artist doing the cover?
And is there a way to make clear this is a whole album-cover in the
linkphrase?
But I do not see any general pro
on the original album/track page, it should probably read "albumtitle
covered by coverartist" which shows both that the album/track was
covered, and by whom in one line.
-b.
azertus wrote:
> Don Redman schreef:
>> The link phrase sounds weirt to my (nonnative) ears: "Natty Dread is
>> covered by N
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:18:01 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
derGraph wrote:
The only reason why we didn't add an album-album version of the cover
type was, that we couldn't come up with an example.
I guess I should have been here last year...
http://musicbrainz.org/album/50b60c72-e11b-42f0-ac6
Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> We can. Added.
>
thanks!
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
12 matches
Mail list logo