On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:07:20 +0100, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
Hello,
I've found a few more problems with the current AR types. (Again) :)
First of them is that I think link phrases "has {additional} chorus
master performed by" and "performed {additional} chorus master" sound a
bit odd and also
Don Redman wrote:
I do not think I understood the first one, and the second one seems
absolutely obvious to me. IIRC it was even proposed before.
I don't know, maybe it's just a problem of my English and I just don't know what
exactly "chorus master" is. But I think "chorus master" == "choir c
> Don Redman wrote:
> > I do not think I understood the first one, and the second one seems
> > absolutely obvious to me. IIRC it was even proposed before.
>
> I don't know, maybe it's just a problem of my English and I
> just don't know what exactly "chorus master" is. But I think
> "chorus ma
Lukáš Lalinský schreef:
Don Redman wrote:
I do not think I understood the first one, and the second one seems
absolutely obvious to me. IIRC it was even proposed before.
I don't know, maybe it's just a problem of my English and I just don't
know what exactly "chorus master" is. But I think "c
That should've been
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=1216276&framed=y&cobrand=2885
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
