On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Max Kellermann m...@duempel.org wrote:
On 2009/03/24 16:26, Jeffrey Middleton jefr...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, I figure a moverange command is a reasonable thing to have within
mpd. I've written and tested the queue_move_range function which will be
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Max Kellermann m...@duempel.org wrote:
In this case, is there any point in using getopt?
Yes, maybe to get the binary size down on systems which support it.
Might be interesting for tiny embedded systems.
For now, I'd say just extend the current integrated
On 2009/03/24 22:55, Jeffrey Middleton jefr...@gmail.com wrote:
This is what I was initially going to do, but the command actually sends
swapid instead of move. I meant to ask about this, but got distracted as I
started working on the mpd side. So is it reasonable to just have ncmpc use
