Re: s/mime with crypt_use_gpgme and gpgsm not working?

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:56:22AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > If you feel comfortable patching and testing, I'd appreciate to know if > that fixes it for you. Regardless, I will take a closer look and apply > that patch myself later today. Hi Michael, I'm attaching a patch that's just a

Re: s/mime with crypt_use_gpgme and gpgsm not working?

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 02:14:00PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: > * On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 12:45PM +0100 I (tatg...@gmail.com) muttered: > > TL;DR i cannot decrypt messages that are encrypted for me. > > Mutt 1.9.4 (2018-02-28) (debian package from testing) > > FWIW, tested against > Mutt 1.9.4+99

Re: s/mime with crypt_use_gpgme and gpgsm not working?

* On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 12:45PM +0100 I (tatg...@gmail.com) muttered: > TL;DR i cannot decrypt messages that are encrypted for me. > Mutt 1.9.4 (2018-02-28) (debian package from testing) FWIW, tested against Mutt 1.9.4+99 (e250c602) (2018-03-15) too. Same problem. Michael -- PGP-Key-ID:

s/mime with crypt_use_gpgme and gpgsm not working?

Hi, i'm trying to run mutt with s/mime and $crypt_use_gpgme set, but i keep running into errors when it comes to decryption. Signing / verifying works ok. TL;DR i cannot decrypt messages that are encrypted for me. [-- Begin signature information --] Good signature from:

Re: Mailing list status

* Heinz Diehl [03-21-18 02:19]: > On 13.03.2018, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > > > That's probably why these two mails slipped though my procmail filters. > > Am I the 0.01 % still using that? > > Nope. Procmail rocks :-) > > > Would it be asking a lot to request an

Re: Mailing list status

On 13.03.2018, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > That's probably why these two mails slipped though my procmail filters. > Am I the 0.01 % still using that? Nope. Procmail rocks :-) > Would it be asking a lot to request an automatic "[mutt-dev] " subject > prefix? It really makes identifying the