On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:46:48AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> >Or maybe vice versa implement header caching using sqlite3. Some people
> >get nervous when they see a program links to multiple libraries of the
> >same class of use. People packaging software do not like it. An
>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 07:42:19AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
I can see that mutt can already use Berkely DB, GDBM, lmdb or qdbm for
caching headers. Wouldn't be possible to use one of them for autocrypt
key storage?
I did consider that, but the implementation uses more than simple
key-value
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2019-08-13 02:59:28 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> On Monday, 2019-08-12 17:38:16 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>
> > On the plus side, it actually gives you some flexibility if you wanted to
> > take advantage of it. You could create a different base64 export of the
> > same
