Re: [Mutt] #3480: IPv6 literal email-address fails

2011-01-01 Thread Gero Treuner
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:16:46AM +0100, Remco Rijnders wrote: > Having had a further look at this, it seems the address parser / tokenizer > sees ':' as a token to split on. I wonder if this is a widely used > convention or one solely used by mutt. If there is no valid use case for > seperating a

Re: [Mutt] #3480: IPv6 literal email-address fails

2011-01-01 Thread Remco Rijnders
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 04:39:35AM -, Mutt wrote: > #3480: IPv6 literal email-address fails > ---+ > Reporter: Harry | Owner: mutt-dev > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: mi

[Mutt] #3480: IPv6 literal email-address fails

2010-12-18 Thread Mutt
#3480: IPv6 literal email-address fails ---+ Reporter: Harry | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: mutt