Ticket #3909 described a problem where an email's reply-to "personal"
part has significance to the processor of the response.
Right now, when the mailbox of the reply-to is the same as the from
address, mutt uses the from address.
Ordinarily, I would think this was an oversight, and just change t
On 2017-01-22 15:16:07 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Ticket #3909 described a problem where an email's reply-to "personal"
> part has significance to the processor of the response.
>
> Right now, when the mailbox of the reply-to is the same as the from
> address, mutt uses the from address.
I
* On 22 Jan 2017, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> I think that a possible reason is to get more meaningful content when
> a user puts Reply-To to his own address but without a comment, e.g.
>
> From: Firstname Lastname
> Reply-To: user@domain
>
> So, "To: Firstname Lastname " is generated inste
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:54:37PM -0800, David Champion wrote:
> * On 22 Jan 2017, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >
> > I think that a possible reason is to get more meaningful content when
> > a user puts Reply-To to his own address but without a comment, e.g.
> >
> > From: Firstname Lastname
> >
