Re: My patch was not accepted in 2009

2018-08-13 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 03:42:49PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 11.06.2018, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > > > Last week I detected that there is an option doing partially > > what I suggested since 2017, yet eight years after my > > proposal. The patch still isn't as good as mine but knowing > >

Re: My patch was not accepted in 2009

2018-08-13 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 11.06.2018, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > Last week I detected that there is an option doing partially > what I suggested since 2017, yet eight years after my > proposal. The patch still isn't as good as mine but knowing > that the noble people that sent me away nine years ago > weren't right

Re: encrypt also to "myself": (was: My patch was not accepted in 2009)

2018-06-11 Thread Claus Assmann
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > It was about encryption: If I write a > message, then encrypt it for the recipient and keep just the > encrypted copy, I will later not be able to read what I > wrote myself. I suggested an option that added myself to the > recipients list when

My patch was not accepted in 2009

2018-06-11 Thread Bertram Scharpf
Hello, almost nine years ago I suggested an enhancement to Mutt and then wrote a patch. It was about encryption: If I write a message, then encrypt it for the recipient and keep just the encrypted copy, I will later not be able to read what I wrote myself. I suggested an option that added myself