Re: urlview patch

1999-08-21 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 04:47:01PM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > urlview was written by Michael Elkins. Are you suggesting I ask him to > add the change I made to the URL display to warn about adding or removing > a "/" in ftp URLSs? > > I would like to see urlview and url_handler in the c

Re: sent-items: To: default?

1999-08-21 Thread Attila Csosz
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 02:07:26PM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote: > Atilla -- > > ...and then Attila Csosz said... > % > % How could I see the To: field instead of From: field in my sent-items folder? > > See section 6.3.58 of the manualfor more details, but you probably > want something

Re: Colouring of email addresses in headers

1999-08-21 Thread Shao Zhang
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Question for ya first...how do you get vim's "standard colours for email > mode" ...I guess how do you get vim's email mode? :) The standard syntax highlight includes the email mode as well. So all you need is to add the following to your /etc/vimrc: " Vi

semi-mutt help? :)

1999-08-21 Thread Fairlight
Well, the 7th day since I hooked up with mutt, and I tackled most of the manual tonight and set up a lot of things I hadn't yet. One of those was colours. I finally have a cool colour scheme that works well. There's just one small part that bothers me: when I go to reply/forward, vi (actually

autoedit/edit-headers?

1999-08-21 Thread Fairlight
In the manual, autoedit says it will skip the "send-menu" if set when replying. I tried setting it an noticed no difference UNLESS I also had edit_headers set as well. The manual indicates there would be extra skipping of questions if edit_headers was set as well, but autoedit by itself does n

Re: Colouring of email addresses in headers

1999-08-21 Thread Alisdair McDiarmid
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 10:29:57AM -0400, Fairlight wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 12:33:37AM +0100, Alisdair McDiarmid wrote: > > I use vim and mutt together (as it should be :) and I'm trying to > > configure them to both have the same syntax colouring display. > > > > I like vim's standard c

Re: semi-mutt help? :)

1999-08-21 Thread Leiden, Soren
VIM has some 150+ color syntax highlighting schemes-- attached is a fairly basic .vimrc file with syntax higlighting enabled... Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Well, the 7th day since I hooked up with mutt, and I tackled most of the > manual tonight and set up a lot of things I hadn't yet.

Re: semi-mutt help? :)

1999-08-21 Thread Fairlight
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 06:18:31AM -0700, Leiden, Soren spewed forth: > VIM has some 150+ color syntax highlighting schemes-- attached is a fairly > basic .vimrc file with syntax higlighting enabled... Looked over that file...I see the syntax on line...but where are the colours actually set

Re: archiving mailboxes each month

1999-08-21 Thread Roberto Suarez Soto
Yes, I'm replying again :-) I have realized just now, and the prior message has already been sent. Consider this just a fix :-) On Aug/19/1999, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote: > You can get around this by using: > mailboxes `find ~/mail -type f -print` > (untested, but I use something simil

Re: archiving mailboxes each month

1999-08-21 Thread Roberto Suarez Soto
On Aug/19/1999, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote: > You can get around this by using: > > mailboxes `find ~/mail -type f -print` Doesn't work here :-) Mutt only treats as mailbox the first item in the list. So, if ~/mail had the folders "folder1", "folder2", "folder3", the above command would

email problem

1999-08-21 Thread Ken W
All, my apologies if email to me was bouncing all over the place yesterday. Someone where my domain name is hosted totally screwed up my DNS record yesterday so it looked as if the domain didn't exist. If anyone had any more input on my postponed menu, I didn't receive it. Could you kindly res

hook dilemma

1999-08-21 Thread Fairlight
I'm using the following: mbox-hook .* =received save-hook .* =received Basically, I didn't understand till I just re-read it that this is message-based, not folder based. What I -want- is any time I quit or change folders, for it to save out the mail to =received (I have that right there) U

0.95.7i: i18n doesn't work

1999-08-21 Thread Christian Ullrich
Hello all, I did just notice that my mutt 0.95.7i won't speak to me in german. I compiled it --with-included-gettext and without that option, but it always speaks english. strace says the following (all 6 result in "no such file or ..."): open("/usr/share/locale/de_DE.ISO-8859-1/LC_MESSAGES/mes

lbdb

1999-08-21 Thread David Ellement
On 990110, at 23:55:54, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > I took over maintenance of [the lbdb] utility and you will find it at > http://luv.rhein.de/~roland/debian/#lbdb now (Source and Debian > binary). Actual version is 0.12. Has anyone built lbdb for HP-UX? I've been trying to build version 0.16, an

Re: semi-mutt help? :)

1999-08-21 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 09:55:59AM -0400, Fairlight wrote: [...] > I'm afraid I'm an old emacs user, and got to know vi, but have paid very > very little attention to vim's extensions since it was introduced to linux. > > Could you do me a favour and digress about where the colours are actuall

Re: building 0.97i on Solaris 2.6

1999-08-21 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Lars -- ...and then Lars Hecking said... % David Thorburn-Gundlach writes: % > Hi, folks -- % > % > I'm trying ot build 0.97i on my Solaris 2.6 box. I found that I had % % I assume you mean 0.95.7? Oh; oops, yep :-) % % > to go and get ncurses, so I did that. Now make reports a problem w

Re: bounce and delivered-to line

1999-08-21 Thread Stan Ryckman
At 03:07 PM 8/20/99 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:40:40 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: [snip] >> Maybe a quick hack would be best here, like writing a script that >> would first remove the Delivered-To header and then remail it >> manually (eg. "grep -v ^Delivered-To:" pi

Re: Colouring of email addresses in headers

1999-08-21 Thread Alisdair McDiarmid
[Sorry for breaking the thread - I'm replying via the web archives as I've not received any mutt-users mail for 12 hours or so.] Sven Guckes wrote: > * Alisdair McDiarmid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990820 13:40]: > > I use vim and mutt together (as it should be :) and I'm trying > > to configure them t

Re: lbdb

1999-08-21 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 12:17:35PM -0700, David Ellement wrote: > On 990110, at 23:55:54, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > > I took over maintenance of [the lbdb] utility and you will find it at > > http://luv.rhein.de/~roland/debian/#lbdb now (Source and Debian > > binary). Actual version is 0.12. What