Re: priority header

1999-12-28 Thread David DeSimone
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was actually thinking about flagging messages as important (the > "!" in the index). That can also be done using procmail to modify the Status: header according to the headers that it notices when the message is received. -- David DeSimone | "T

Re: Key binding problems

1999-12-28 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On 28-Dec-1999, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > I've just recently switched to using aterm instead of xterm with my X, > and as a result some of my Mutt key bindings have stopped working. > Apparently there is some difference in the programs. I'm using aterm as well. All keys working well. These are the

Key binding problems

1999-12-28 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Hi, I've just recently switched to using aterm instead of xterm with my X, and as a result some of my Mutt key bindings have stopped working. Apparently there is some difference in the programs. Anyway, I'm puzzled over this. When I press Home I get (according to a script I run to check the asc

my_hdr From: && fcc-hook

1999-12-28 Thread Alexander Sclearuc
Hello guys, The problem: I've corrected mutt configuration adding next string in it (to represent my current configuration): my_hdr From: Alexander Sclearuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Now all my fcc-save-hook and fcc-hook directives do not have any effect: by default all messages are proposed to be s

Re: mutt/gpg crashes Outlook 2000?

1999-12-28 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-12-27 20:28:17 -0800, rex wrote: > No offense, but if Outlook crashes the lame M$ OS when it > receives RFC 822 compliant mail, why should we be concerned? > Rather than try to code a workaround, wouldn't it be best to show > the world that M$ employs incompetent programmers who can't cod