Re: Adding fields to (MH) messages

On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 08:57:49PM +0100, Jos Vos wrote: > When I use Mutt for MH folders, it adds Status and Content-Length > fields to each individual message and thus changes all files, even > whena you have only opened the folder and not touched any messages. > When you have MH folders with th

Re: gpg hassles with mutt

> You are correct Lars, I thought he was having a problem using GPG and not > the warning, DOH! I thought so too, but because the original poster's error description was unclear and incomplete, I focused on the warning part instead. Both our suggestions should help :)

Re: IMAP in Mutt

On Saturday, 12 February 2000 at 14:57, Scott A. McIntyre wrote: > Brendan, > > In looking to move to Mutt for email (1.1.3i is what I'm using at the > moment) I've noticed that either my own clue about Mutt, or a handy > piece of functionality, is missing... > > The problem is that I have a LOT

Re: Reply-To more than one recipient

Horacio MG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 12 Feb 2000: > [yes] replies to the first address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > [no] replies to the second address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) My Mutt (1.1.3) behaves differently too. Pressing "r" and "y" will reply to both addresses, "r" and "n" to just the iberia.e

Re: Reply-To more than one recipient

On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 08:29:55PM +0100, Horacio MG wrote: > Hi, > > I just realized that I can specify more than one recipient in the > reply-to header. I tried this as out of need to have some replies sent > over to different addresses. > > The mail arrives fine, with the two addresses inclu

Re: gpg hassles with mutt

Hi Lars! On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: >> In your muttrc add: source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc Check that .mutt/gpg.rc exists. >> If not it should be in the contrib section of the tarball. >> >> On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Salvatore Greco wrote: >> >>> I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG

Re: save-hook for 'mutt-users' list doesn't work

> perfectly happy with it. One thing is strange to me: I've got some lists > defined so I can save messages to default folders. This works for all of them > except for the mutt-users list! Here's a part of my .muttrc: > > save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +mutt-users The list is hosted at mutt.org, s

Reply-To more than one recipient

Hi, I just realized that I can specify more than one recipient in the reply-to header. I tried this as out of need to have some replies sent over to different addresses. The mail arrives fine, with the two addresses included in the Reply-To field (as you might be able to see in this message), b

Adding fields to (MH) messages

Hi, When I use Mutt for MH folders, it adds Status and Content-Length fields to each individual message and thus changes all files, even whena you have only opened the folder and not touched any messages. When you have MH folders with thousands of messsages (4000+), this is not really a desirable

[solved] Re: mail does not reach certain hosts

On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 02:15:47AM +, Lars Hecking wrote: > Michael Tatge writes: > > I have a major problem with Mutt 1.0i. Mail to some hosts does not reach its > > destination without me getting an error message. I use sendmail as MTA and > > it seems that sendmail is correctly configured.

save-hook for 'mutt-users' list doesn't work

Hi, I'm using Mutt 0.93.1i (1998-07-14) on Linux 2.0.36 [using ncurses 4.2] and I'm perfectly happy with it. One thing is strange to me: I've got some lists defined so I can save messages to default folders. This works for all of them except for the mutt-users list! Here's a part of my .muttrc:

Re: gpg hassles with mutt

Sean F Rima writes: > Hi Salvatore! > > In your muttrc add: > source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc > Check that .mutt/gpg.rc exists. If not it should be in the contrib section > of the tarball. > > Sean > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Salvatore Greco wrote: > > > I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG for

Re: gpg hassles with mutt

Hi Salvatore! In your muttrc add: source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc Check that .mutt/gpg.rc exists. If not it should be in the contrib section of the tarball. Sean On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Salvatore Greco wrote: > I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG for their privacy needs. I > have installed GP

procmail not processing application/pgp?

Hi, I just received a message sent with pine and gnupg signed using application/pgp, and didn't catch the sig: Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="135843165-1694285145-950362731=:690" A second message (same person, same sig, also pine) was correctly processed: Content-Type: application/p

gpg hassles with mutt

I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG for their privacy needs. I have installed GPG and I replaced the relevant sections of the .muttrc file and this is the error I get. If I run gpg on the saved email message, it works. Any ideas ? Please help. [-- PGP output follows (current

Re: Customizing mutt

On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > I want to make "collapse-all" standard. I couldn't find a variable for > that so i tried I only see set collapse_unread in the manual > folder-hook =* 'collapse-all' > folder-hook =* '' folder-hook . set collapse_unre

Customizing mutt

#include I'm a newby in using mutt. And i'm just in the step of customizing it. I have two questions. First: I want to make "collapse-all" standard. I couldn't find a variable for that so i tried folder-hook =* 'collapse-all' folder-hook =* '' but mutt always says "unknown command collapse