Hardy Merrill muttered:
> > > I'm having trouble using Ctl-K to send my public key
> >
> > That's clear. The default keybinding for is k :)
>
> I mis-wrote - I really used k, and *that* created an empty
> attachment. Am I trying to do this the right way?
What does pgp6 +compatible -kxaf 'You
Lukasz --
...and then Lukasz Stelmach said...
% Greetings!!
%
% I've started using mutt yesterday and the first thing there should by
Welcome!
% is something that all fido mailreaders and pine have. quote_chars in
% those programs may contain initials of person who wrote the letter i
% am rep
After an unfortunate delay (for which I apologize), www.mutt.org has been
updated for 1.2.4.
In addition, I've added several links/made a few corrections that have been
submitted to me or the list over the last couple weeks:
http://www.diku.dk/~pink/pine2mutt_aliases.pl -- convert pine address b
Greetings!!
I've started using mutt yesterday and the first thing there should by
is something that all fido mailreaders and pine have. quote_chars in
those programs may contain initials of person who wrote the letter i
am replying. For example when you answer this letter it should be
quoted with
* Michael Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys. So 1.2i is building, but I just tried 1.2.4i for the hell of it,
> and I got this.
>
> [bmerh56e-pegctrl-mutt-1.2.4]$ make
> cd . && aclocal -I m4
> cd . && autoheader
> /opt/corp/unsupported/bin/autoheader: Symbol `PR
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 12:45:19PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> As you can see, you can specify just about any mutt command in a
> send-hook and it's triggered by your recipient. The only thing about
> this that I don't like is that send-hooks (as well as fcc- and [-]save-
> hooks) don't have a way
Marianne Albin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 11 Jul 2000:
> If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe"
> option should now be denoted as "lists" instead.
Even so, I've never gotten "list-reply" to do a regular reply if I
try to do the list-reply function on a mes
John Poltorak muttered:
>
> I have never understood the purpose of sendhooks or what they can do,
> so I'm probably missing out on a great feature of Mutt...
You really do! Send-hooks are a great and very powerful configuration
tool. See the manual's sections 3.17 and 4.1 - 4.4
> Can some provi
Marius, et al --
...and then Marius Gedminas said...
% On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 05:42:13PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
% > Jerry Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 11 Jul 2000:
% > >
% > > Can i specify two sendhooks? or will they overwrite eachother?
% >
% > Two send-hooks with the exact
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 05:42:13PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Jerry Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 11 Jul 2000:
> > the problem is
> > i need to be able to also set my From header to something else when i do this?
> >
> > Can i specify two sendhooks? or will they overwrite eachother?
John --
...and then John Poltorak said...
%
% I have never understood the purpose of sendhooks or what they can do,
% so I'm probably missing out on a great feature of Mutt...
Oh, my; yes, they are quite cool and fun to boot.
%
% Can some provide me with a simple sendhook and tell me what I
Michael Tatge [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Hardy Merrill muttered:
> > mutt 1.2i
> > pgp 6.5.2
> >
> > I'm having trouble using Ctl-K to send my public key
>
> That's clear. The default keybinding for is k :)
> ^K defaults to i.e. pgp tries to extract any pgp-keys
> from the current message an
Marianne Albin proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe"
>option should now be denoted as "lists" instead.
You've got it devant-derriere ;) Lists was the old one - you'll have to
use "subscribe" now ...
> 2. Mailing list behaviour
If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe"
option should now be denoted as "lists" instead.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy M. Dolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, July 10, 2000 2:19 pm
Subject: combined reply & list-reply
> Is there some way to have
Jerry Walsh proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>i have a sendhook setup in my .muttrc to change my signature when i email
>abuse@ domain or postmaster@ domain
tlr has already explained this - but I'd advise against using .sig files
when you mail abuse / postmaster addresses.
Simple reason is, such
On 2000-07-11 15:59:30 +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
> Can some provide me with a simple sendhook and tell me what I can
> use it for, than I can take it from there.
send-hook '~A' 'unmy_hdr From:'
send-hook '~C obscure-list' 'my_hdr From: obscure-address'
This combination of send-hooks would, fo
Hardy Merrill muttered:
> mutt 1.2i
> pgp 6.5.2
>
> I'm having trouble using Ctl-K to send my public key
That's clear. The default keybinding for is k :)
^K defaults to i.e. pgp tries to extract any pgp-keys
from the current message and inserts them into your public-keyring.
> - it creates an
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Jerry Walsh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have a sendhook setup in my .muttrc to change my signature when i email
> abuse@ domain or postmaster@ domain
> the problem is
> i need to be able to also set my From header to something else when i do this?
>
> Can i spec
Jerry Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 11 Jul 2000:
> the problem is
> i need to be able to also set my From header to something else when i do this?
>
> Can i specify two sendhooks? or will they overwrite eachother?
Two send-hooks with the exact same regexp pattern will overwrite,
howeve
Hello,
i have a sendhook setup in my .muttrc to change my signature when i email
abuse@ domain or postmaster@ domain
the problem is
i need to be able to also set my From header to something else when i do this?
Can i specify two sendhooks? or will they overwrite eachother?
TIA,
Jerry.
I have not been on the mutt lists for some time but I heard from Magnus
Bodin that there has been some discussion of mutt vs. qmail-inject. The
trouble is that mutt quotes the addresses (RFC821) for sendmail but qmail
expects them unquoted. A couple of years ago I sent the attached code to the
mut
Mark D. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 09 Jul 2000:
> - I must either set $MAIL env var or set -f, or it won't open the correct starting
> screen (regardless of the set folder variable in .muttrc).
$folder controls where the = and + shortcuts point, the default inbox is
defined with t
BTW, I've copied the pgp6.rc file to my ~/.mutt directory,
and have "source"d it into my muttrc file. Looks to me like
the command to extract a key in that pgp6.rc file is:
# export a key from the public key ring
set pgp_export_command="pgp +compatible -kxaf %r"
Any ideas?
TIA.
--
Hardy Me
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:37:11PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote:
>
>
> Look further down the thread. It is an error that may be qmail-inject
> specific with arguments on the command line.
And the solution seems to queue mail with a wrapper program.
Attached is muttqmail.c that fixes the thing.
mutt 1.2i
pgp 6.5.2
I'm having trouble using Ctl-K to send my public key - it
creates an attachment that is named with the keyid if my
public key, but the attachment is empty. Is there something
else I'm supposed to do to get my public key "in" the
attachment?
TIA.
--
Hardy Merrill
Mission Cr
On 2000-07-11 10:32:37 +0200, Martin [Keso] Keseg wrote:
>> Note that this cache invalidation is _not_ an error.
>> In fact, some Linux versions incorrectly used cached
>> data, which reportedly lead to mail loss in several
>> cases.
> Isn't better to test for host enviroment and make
> decision
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 10:32:37 +0200, Martin [Keso] Keseg wrote:
> Isn't better to test for host enviroment and make decision on result ?
> For example use cache if host system is solaris or another unix with good
> caching.
I used to use dotlocking only under Solaris+NFS, and I *never* had
any
Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On 2000-07-10 17:59:31 +0200, Ives Aerts wrote:
>
> > We are currently using mutt-1.0i on solaris 2.6. I
> > would like to upgrade to 1.2.4 but it is a _lot_ slower
> > than 1.0 when reading my mailbox over NFS. Compiling
> > with --disable-fcntl hel
Is there some way to have the 'r' key in mutt 1.2 reply as a
list-reply if the address matches lists or subscribe, and do a normal
reply if it doesnt? This is how the 1.0 series worked for me, and now
in 1.2 I keep sending replies to single people and not noticing it
until days later (I've already
29 matches
Mail list logo
