Re: masking attached file local path

On Sunday, 30 July 2000 at 00:32, David T-G wrote: > Hi, folks -- > > When running 0.95.4i and attaching a file, mutt defaulted to searching my > current directory. Under 1.2.4i mutt now apparently defaults to my > $folder even for ordinary file attachments. Although surprising, that's > not so

masking attached file local path

Hi, folks -- When running 0.95.4i and attaching a file, mutt defaulted to searching my current directory. Under 1.2.4i mutt now apparently defaults to my $folder even for ordinary file attachments. Although surprising, that's not so bad, because I can simply start my filename with ./ and then l

Re: List handling broken

Alan Batie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 29 Jul 2000: > I find that the list handling is broken > Any suggestions on fixing this short of digging into the code? Yes, read doc/README.UPGRADE. :-) In short: replace all the "lists" statements in your .muttrc with "subscribe". Regards, Mikko

List handling broken

I'm just upgraded to the latest mutt (1.2.4) after running with an ancient version forever (pre-1.0). I find that the list handling is broken --- according to the documentation on www.mutt.org, nothing much there has really changed --- the default index_format has %L in it, so the list name shoul

Re: Hiding Subjects in PGP-encrypted messages

On 2000.07.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Randall Hopper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One wish I have is for there to be an alternative way to specify the > subject such that it is stored and retrieved from the body and not the > header, so it can be PGPed. I'd like this, too, and s

Re: Two addresses, one laptop, and Mutt

DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 29 Jul 2000: > I believe I know my problem now. I use ssmtp to send my mail from my laptop > to my mail server. The ssmtp man page states that the -f flag is only > honored *if* the 'From:' field in the e-mail header is not present. Oops. That's a pretty

Re: Two addresses, one laptop, and Mutt

I believe I know my problem now. I use ssmtp to send my mail from my laptop to my mail server. The ssmtp man page states that the -f flag is only honored *if* the 'From:' field in the e-mail header is not present. Since the Mutt manual states that 'envelope_from' is sent to sendmail via the -f

Re: Hiding Subjects in PGP-encrypted messages

On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 05:43:10PM -0400, Randall Hopper muttered: > I now use PGP exclusively for swapping personal mail with other Mutt > users. > > One wish I have is for there to be an alternative way to specify the > subject such that it is stored and retrieved from the body and not

Hiding Subjects in PGP-encrypted messages

I now use PGP exclusively for swapping personal mail with other Mutt users. One wish I have is for there to be an alternative way to specify the subject such that it is stored and retrieved from the body and not the header, so it can be PGPed. Is there any way to do this? If not, go

Re: anyone using muttzilla

FYI: It looks like I may finally have the time to work on muttzilla again. I'm setting up muttzilla with sourceforge. -users and -announce mailing lists are up, but the CVS repository hasn't been populated yet. Hopefully there will be a slightly more user-friendly version available soon. Anyw

Re: extent of IMAP support?

On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 03:17:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Mutt's IMAP4 support is good and implements the IMAP4 'philosopy' much > better than most MUAs in my opinion. The only MUAs that I have found > which are in the same league (vis-a-vis IMAP support) are:- > > tkRat >

Re: Two addresses, one laptop, and Mutt

Using a large mallet, DAve whacked out: > Any pointers to a current manual? The one I have came from the webiste I > believe and is dated Apr 1998. Aha, /usr/local/docs/mutt/html, I'll get > reading... then I'll check into everyones suggestions. You could also look at /usr/local/docs/mutt