Re: "From " header 'problem'

Gerard -- ...and then Gerard Beekmans said... % Messages containing a "From " header like the following are recognized by mutt % just fine: % From <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat Aug 12 20:30 EST % % The problem is that as soon as the "From " header contains the author's % name, mutt doesn't recog

"From " header 'problem'

Messages containing a "From " header like the following are recognized by mutt just fine: From <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat Aug 12 20:30 EST The problem is that as soon as the "From " header contains the author's name, mutt doesn't recognize the message and skips it. I have various mail folder

Re: not quoting signature on replies

* Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13 Aug 2000 01:07]: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 00:55:01 +1000, iain truskett wrote: > > Nope, it doesn't. Nor should it really. You might be thinking of pine, > > whose editor is pico-based. > But the manual says it has one. I don't understand... "editor Ty

[Fwd: gpg + mutt + keyfiles]

OK, attempt nr 2.. my previous one didn't get answered at all .. does anyone have an idea how to get started on mutt + gpg + seperate keyfiles ? Grtz, Nils Hi there! I have been trying to make gpg dump its keys it fetches while being in mutt in a seperate file. To make this happen, I set the

Re: not quoting signature on replies

Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 12 Aug 2000: > But the manual says it has one. I don't understand... The editor that the manual is referring to is the one-line editor, used for getting various strings from the user (eg. email address to send mail to, email's subject, the : comma

Re: not quoting signature on replies

On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 00:55:01 +1000, iain truskett wrote: > Nope, it doesn't. Nor should it really. You might be thinking of pine, > whose editor is pico-based. But the manual says it has one. I don't understand... -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: - 100%

Re: not quoting signature on replies

* Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13 Aug 2000 00:47]: [...] > BTW, doesn't Mutt have a builtin editor, or has it been removed? > If it has one, then this functionality should be in Mutt. Nope, it doesn't. Nor should it really. You might be thinking of pine, whose editor is pico-based. To us

Re: not quoting signature on replies

On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 11:11:58 -0400, Bob Bell wrote: > Indeed, the typical reply is that this is functionality that belongs > in the editor, not in mutt. BTW, doesn't Mutt have a builtin editor, or has it been removed? If it has one, then this functionality should be in Mutt. -- Vincent

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

Hello Mutt Users! On pią 11 sie 2000 07:36:37 GMT David T-G wrote: > Nah; I still like finding a way to let your editor, perhaps with help > from other tools, do it for you. Let mutt decide whether or not to > attach your signature and leave it at that. Well, maybe you're right. Altough such fe

Re: not quoting signatures on reply

* Caster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [12 Aug 2000 05:50]: > Hello Mutt Users! > On pia 11 sie 2000 00:19:09 GMT Peter Palfrader wrote: > > set editor="vim +\`awk '/^$/ {print i+2; exit} {i++}' %s\` %s" > Even more clever :) Clever, but only useful if your vi clone doesn't support something like: set