Re: netscape/mailcap

I've tried: renaming the .netscape directory to .netscape_bak and opening a new netscape moving .mailcap files and opening netscape removed plugger specifying netscape to open html files in applications directory in netscape nothing works. What file is overriding these and causing the error bel

Netscape/Mailcap was Mutt

I don't know why but this originally was posted as mutt.. Something overwrote my .mailcap file and I'm receiving the following error message when I use netscape and clik on a text/html link: Netscape subprocess diagnostics (stdout/stderr) ex/vi: Vi's standard input and output should be a termi

Re: mutt and qmail

Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 31 Aug 2000: > To have new/ tmp/ cur/ for every mailing list? So what? It's 3 extra dirs, it's not like any modern computer will likely run out of inodes or disk space with current disk sizes... Normally, it's all hidden by the application anyway.

Re: defining a macro to "sz" an attachment

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:04:23AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: > Basically, the end result is that if I have a file called > "stressre1.exe" (for example) attached to an email, I can write a macro > that when invoked will do "sz stressre1.exe" as if I had saved the > attachment, exited mutt, and

Re: mutt and qmail

Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any other advantages with this setup? You mean, besides not silently corrupting your stored and incoming mail, and being higher-performance, working over NFS properly, and generally behaving properly? No, no advantages at all. Yes, this is sa

Re: mutt and qmail

Are there any other advantages with this setup? On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 01:28:07PM -0600, Charles Cazabon muttered: | Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > don't you find the file structure of this just horrid though? | > | > To have new/ tmp/ cur/ for every mailing list? I would like to

Re: mutt and qmail

Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > don't you find the file structure of this just horrid though? > > To have new/ tmp/ cur/ for every mailing list? I would like to and would > perfer to use maildir for the mailing lists, I don't know why... > > What are the advantages to this... Maildir

Re: mutt and qmail

don't you find the file structure of this just horrid though? To have new/ tmp/ cur/ for every mailing list? I would like to and would perfer to use maildir for the mailing lists, I don't know why... What are the advantages to this... I have all my mailing lists still going to mbox, whereas anyt

Re: application/octet-stream

Daniel -- ...and then Daniel Kollar said... % Hi there, % % I'm not happy with the way mutt manages received mail attachments. Sorry to hear that! % % One problem is: I often receive html-pages pgp encrypted as octet-stream. I've been thinking about this and haven't yet come up with an answ

defining a macro to "sz" an attachment

This is less a question about a specific implementation (although I would like to know how to do this) and more about the concept in general; is it possible to, at the stroke of a key (macro), have mutt save an attachment to a file and then run a shell commandline with the saved file's name some

Re: set pgp_gpg="/usr/bin/gpg"

On 2000-08-30 17:18:29 -0700, Sean Rhea wrote: > Mail-Followup-To: srhea, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please set use_domain, or teach your MTA to rewrite Mail-Followup-To headers. > in my muttrc. This ensured that I got the gpg I wanted, > regardless of my PATH. The never versions of mutt don't seem to