Hi mutt-users!
For some reason mutt is acting weird on me:
If someone sends me a mail with the header From: "\\`hee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or
anything else with the double backslash in it, mutt does not seem to include
this in the "To" field when replying, nor in the attribution.
I realise the \
I had same annoyance. I made following entry to my .muttrc
to turn on/off GPG/PGP sig check to avoid this annoyance.
macro index S ":toggle pgp_verify_sig\n" # define S to toggle GPG check
If you find better method to deal with this, let me know by cc:
Osamu
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:35:06P
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 08:21:28AM -0500, Josh Huber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> * ^TO_about.com
>
> the TO_ is expanded to a nice regex which matches the proper text
> before an address.
Everyone keeps saying this, and it still doesn't work. That nice regex
doesn't match the text *in* an ad
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 04:21:30PM -0500, Josh Huber wrote:
> The reasoning behind this is:
>
> > > * ^To: .*about.com.*
>
> ...often addresses are formatted in a way like:
>
> John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Doe)
>
> but are not that often just the email address al
Bruce A. Petro wrote (about a procmail condition):
> I understand the leading .* based on your remark, but what about the
> trailing .* ??
You can safely omit it. It doesn't make any difference whatsoever with
regard to matching.
/HW
