Re: procmail

2001-08-19 Thread Richard B Mahoney
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 03:09:23AM -0400, Ken Wahl wrote: Trying to help you set up procmail for the first time is going to be beyond what can be taught to you in a single email message but I found the below sources to be all I needed when I did it myself. The man page: man procmailex

Re: procmail

2001-08-19 Thread Ken Weingold
One thing, too. It is possible that the MTA on your server is ignoring procmail. I had this issue once on a shell account I got. they use dmail, and it did just this. I don't have root there, and the admin is impossible to get hold of, so I gave up. Just a thought. -Ken

Re: procmail

2001-08-19 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Ken Weingold mutt [19/08/01 05:22 -0400]: One thing, too. It is possible that the MTA on your server is ignoring procmail. I had this issue once on a shell account I got. they use dmail, and it did just this. I don't have root there, and the admin is impossible to get hold of, so I gave

Re: procmail

2001-08-19 Thread Ken Weingold
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Ken Weingold mutt [19/08/01 05:22 -0400]: One thing, too. It is possible that the MTA on your server is ignoring procmail. I had this issue once on a shell account I got. they use dmail, and it did just this. I don't have root there,

hostname question

2001-08-19 Thread Jeff Abrahamson
I recently moved to debian from redhat. My home directory hasn't changed, I'm using the same config files for mutt, as far as I can tell. The difference is that where before I got a From: field in mail I was composing, now I don't. (So I set use_from, voila.) And then the From: field that I do

Check a mailbox for new mail w/o using access time

2001-08-19 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello! It happens that if I run some useful program on my mailboxes (e.g. grep, glimpseindex and unison, to name a few), they appear then in mutt as not having new messages anymore, since all access times are incremented. I understand that the access time is the standard way to check for new

Re: hostname question

2001-08-19 Thread Thomas Huemmler
Hi Jeff, * Jeff Abrahamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010819 23:12]: I was composing, now I don't. (So I set use_from, voila.) And then the From: field that I do get is Jeff Abrahamson jeff instead of Jeff Abrahamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Sendmail rewriting saves my butt on outgoing mail, but it

Re: Check a mailbox for new mail w/o using access time

2001-08-19 Thread Philip Zeyliger
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:09:05PM +0200, Enrico Zini scribbled: It happens that if I run some useful program on my mailboxes (e.g. grep, glimpseindex and unison, to name a few), they appear then in mutt as not having new messages anymore, since all access times are incremented. [snip] Maybe

Re: hostname question

2001-08-19 Thread Morten Brix Pedersen
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: Anyone have any thoughts on what might have caused such a change? It's probably because the mutt defaults on Debian are different, you can see the defaults in /etc/Muttrc. For example I can see these lines on my Debian box: #

Re: Check a mailbox for new mail w/o using access time

2001-08-19 Thread Enrico Zini
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 02:47:10PM -0700, Philip Zeyliger wrote: I've run into this same problem with mailboxes on NFS. I manually use the touch command to reset the access time: touch -a -t 8201010101 somemailfolder (Different version of touch have different syntax.) This sets the access

Re: hostname question

2001-08-19 Thread Jeff Abrahamson
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:52:58PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote: On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: Anyone have any thoughts on what might have caused such a change? It's probably because the mutt defaults on Debian are different, you can see the defaults

Re: Make it simple?

2001-08-19 Thread David T-G
Adam -- ...and then Adam Shostack said... % Hi, Hi! % % I just upgraded to mutt 1.2.5, and its insisting on coloring % everything. I managed to get close to what I want by commenting Heh :-) % HAVE_COLOR out of config.h, but now I still get things like That's probably a good way to

Re: Check a mailbox for new mail w/o using access time

2001-08-19 Thread David T-G
Enrico -- ...and then Enrico Zini said... % On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 02:47:10PM -0700, Philip Zeyliger wrote: % % touch -a -t 8201010101 somemailfolder ... % So if you use things like grep in a script, you can have the script % change the times back. % % Uhm... doing this would make all

my_hdr based on compose vs reply

2001-08-19 Thread dannyman
So, I'm job hunting, and the thought hit my head that is better to have my heder say danny howard if I'm e-mailing somebody for the first time, but once I have a dialogue going, and I reply to a mesage, I can just be dannyman But I'm not clever enough to just figure out how or even if I can do