Dear all!
To my great embarrassment, there has been a bug in the mutt RPM
user poll page - all Red Hat users have been counted as Mandrake
users... . Therefore:
First of all: Thanks to the 47 people who took the time to complete
the poll!
And then:
***
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:46:15PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 18:46:15 +0200
> From: Jesper Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: resend-message (esc e) not honouring $record
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
>
>
* On Tue Oct 02, Ryan Cook wrote:
> What's wrong with the copy in the 'outgoing' folder? Why does it have
> to show up in your Inboxor I guess you want the message filed into
> a specific directory?
Eh...what? I get the impression you've misunderstood something I wrote.
I just want my outgo
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 06:20:54PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
> * On Tue Oct 02, pat wrote:
> > I'm new at this but,
> > ?? perhaps ?? cc yourself ??
>
> You're right, that is one solution to getting my own copy of what I send.
> But my problem was more specific: to automatically make mutt
* On Tue Oct 02, René Clerc wrote:
> macro index \ee "fsent_mail\n"
>
> does the trick for me.
This does indeed do the trick. I should have been able to find
that one out by myself, shouldn't I? *Blushing*
But I still think this workaround should not be needed.
Jesper
--
Jesper Ho
* On Tue Oct 02, pat wrote:
> I'm new at this but,
> ?? perhaps ?? cc yourself ??
You're right, that is one solution to getting my own copy of what I send.
But my problem was more specific: to automatically make mutt record the
fact that I've sent a new message, something it does in all cas
* Jesper Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-10-2001 13:38]:
| * On Mon Oct 01, Ben Reser wrote:
| > It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
| > several times.
|
| Well, I have yet to see a good explanation why this choice has been
| made. I am also still searching for a c
I'm new at this but,
?? perhaps ?? cc yourself ??
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:36:40PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
> * On Mon Oct 01, Ben Reser wrote:
> > It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
> > several times.
>
> Well, I have yet to see a good explanation w
* On Mon Oct 01, Ben Reser wrote:
> It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
> several times.
Well, I have yet to see a good explanation why this choice has been
made. I am also still searching for a convenient way to use an old
message as template for a new one, without
On 2001-10-01 12:12 -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> > When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc
> > e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate
> > or an overlook ?
>
> It's deliberate. Search th
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> Well, When I reply back - not with 'L' but with 'r', yep, you guessed
> it, I have inappropriately brought an off list discussion back on
> list, often leaving out some important context. Very annoying.
> People get quite flustered about it too. Understandibly so.
perha
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:20:49AM +0200, Piet Delport ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 at 11:19:43 -0500, David Champion wrote:
>
> You can do it a bit more elegantly[1] with this ex one-liner:
>
> 1;/^$/+1,$!gpg --clearsign
You might also want to redirect stderr to avoid putt
Hey folks. I need some help here to stop making an ass of myself on
mailing lists.
First, a description of how I keep doing this:
My imap account is divided into quite a number of folders, each of
which I can have mail delivered directly into by using the 'plussed
users' format - note my From h
13 matches
Mail list logo
